Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Forgotten Mother

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 53
1
Articles / I was told I was unworthy to be a mother, then they stole my baby
« on: September 06, 2026, 05:50:15 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2el0l0d38zo

I was told I was unworthy to be a mother, then they stole my baby

Nichola Rutherford
BBC Scotland News

Published 30 August 2026

Marion McMillan was 17, pregnant and unmarried, when she made her first trip to England from her home in the south-west of Scotland.  It was 1966 and she was sent by her family to a maternity home run by the Salvation Army more than 150 miles away, in Newcastle upon Tyne.  The young mum spent nine months with her baby a beautiful boy with "gorgeous wee black hair" before he was taken from her.  She begged staff to let her keep him. "I said 'please help me keep my baby, don't let them take my baby, please' and he was gone," she told a new BBC documentary, Stolen Babies.

Warning: This story contains racist language and descriptions of sexual abuse and violence

It tells the stories of some of the 250,000 women who were forced to hand over their newborns for adoption between 1949 and 1976.  They were powerless against the will of the state, social workers and religious organisations, and the system which supplied infants to adoptive families.  "Let's face it, we were working-class, unmarried girls having babies that were being adopted by middle-class women," another victim, Ann Keen, told the programme.

For years many of the women kept their ordeal their shame secret.  In July, outgoing prime minister Sir Keir Starmer issued a formal apology to those mothers, telling them: "The shame is not yours the shame is ours."

Marion's story: 'They cannae take my baby away from me'

Marion grew up in Stranraer in the 1960s where she fell for an older man who had emigrated from Pakistan.  "I was in love at the time and it was so lovely, I never gave it a second thought," she said.

"We were only together just a few short times, and I'd never told my family but at 17 I became pregnant out of wedlock."

She hoped they would marry but her boyfriend knew their relationship would not be accepted.  "Nobody will want you to go with a black man, Marion," he told her.

In their last conversation, he suggested emigrating to Hawaii where he believed mixed-race marriages were more acceptable.  "I never saw him ever again after that," she said. "Didn't know what was ahead of me. The conveyor belt of 'unwed mother' took control, and that was when I lost control."

She gave birth at Hopedene, a home for unmarried mothers where conditions were austere and treatment could be brutal.  "Everything, from the minute you cross their threshold, is that you're unworthy to be a mother and we're taking your baby from you," Marion said.

"It's going for adoption. So you better get used to that, girl, because you've no money, you've no place to live, you've not got anybody to support you."

While giving birth she was slapped across the face by the matron for trying to get off a bed.  "And I don't know what was worse, the shock of her doing that [or] being in heavy labour," she said. "And the next thing my son is born."

She wasn't allowed to hold him until the following day.  "I was absolutely terrified," Marion said. "Absolutely terrified that they're taking my baby. They cannae take my baby away from me."

But Marion got to spend longer with her baby than some of the other girls in mother-and-baby homes across the UK.  "I was a Scotch girl with a half-caste, that's what the Salvation Army recognised me to be," Marion said.

"And of course you were told that half-caste is very rarely successful in adoption."

He was nine months old when he was picked out by his adoptive parents. Marion compared the wait to handing him over to death row.  "[The matron] took him, and she was weeping with me, and she must have had another member of staff that took him then, and she was still holding me."

Her desperate pleas to keep the baby were ignored.  Unwelcome back home in Stranraer, she ended up in a women's hostel in Glasgow.  "Suddenly I'm banished from where I was born and brought up and I'm entirely on my own again," she told BBC Scotland News.

Marion was finally reunited with her son in 2004, but her experience as a teenager continues to cast a long shadow.  "It's been painful for him, painful for me, painful for his [adoptive] parents, painful for everybody.  But it you take away the pain it's been a gift from God because all the years I missed him."

Ann Keen: 'I was told I'd never see him again'

Ann Keen was 17 and working in a toilet roll factory in Ewloe, Flintshire, when she was asked out by a handsome salesman.  "That's when it happened. In today's terms it was without consent. You didn't say that in the 60s," she said.

Like Marion, she was sent away so the problem could be "dealt with". She gave birth at an NHS hospital in Swansea, where she was denied pain relief.  "I was told I wouldn't have anything for pain because I would remember it, and I wouldn't be a bad girl again," she said.

"They saw me as a woman that didn't have any morality and therefore I wasn't worthy of any help. And I don't believe, had I been married that that would have happened."

Ann was told that she could spend 10 days with her baby but on the eighth day she went to the nursery and he wasn't there.  A "cruel" midwife told her: "He's waiting for his new mummy. You'll never see him again."

She took her to a Victorian bathroom, put her in the bath and grabbed her breast.  The midwife told Ann: "I'm getting rid of this milk, you won't be needing it."

"And that's when I knew I'd lost everything," Ann said.

Joan Chambers: 'Teachers are supposed to be trustworthy'

Joan Chambers was a 14-year-old schoolgirl in Sunderland when she realised she was pregnant.  A teacher had starting asking her to go for walks in the countryside.  "I wasn't alarmed by it, because, you know, he was a teacher and teachers are supposed to be trustworthy," she said. "I trusted him, I really did."

One day he raped her. "All I remember is the pain," she said. "I didn't understand what was happening."

Five weeks before giving birth, she had to give evidence against the man in court.  Years later she discovered archives that showed that the judge had told the jury not to believe her testimony.  She told the documentary that the judge said: "He's got a good career ahead of him, so don't let her being pregnant sway you."

She went on: "That hurt. It really hurt when I read that years later. For a judge to say that."

The man was acquitted.  Joan spent the last few weeks of her pregnancy at a mother-and-baby home but she said she had "blanked out" the birth.  "It must have been so painful. I wasn't given painkillers or anything like that, " she added.

"The next thing I remember is like my legs were up in stirrups, a green cover over my legs, waiting for the doctor to come and stitch me. I had been torn to shreds, absolutely torn to shreds."

Her baby was taken when he was three weeks old, a week before Christmas.  "They took him from me and then they told me to go back in the nursery and take the bedding out of his cot and get it ready for the next baby," she said.

Joan was 66 when they were finally reunited.  "It was amazing, but it was so sad," she said. "He'd never looked for me because he had a happy adoption."

'The apologies prove we weren't to blame'

In 2023, Nicola Sturgeon described Marion McMillan as "one of the most ardent campaigners" as she formally apologised for the role of the state in the forced adoptions.  "It was always cruel, unjust and profoundly wrong," Scotland's first minister said.

In an updated apology, externalpublished on Friday, The Salvation Army said it was "profoundly sorry and deeply ashamed" that vulnerable young women did not get the help they needed in their mother and baby homes.  "We know we must be held accountable for those we let down and reflect on our role in a society that worked against pregnant unmarried women," its territorial leaders, commissioners Paul and Jenine Main, added.

Marion says still more can be done. She wants more support for the victims of forced adoption - mothers, children and adoptive parents.  And she would like to see a centre of excellence for adoption in Scotland, where anyone involved in adoption can receive comprehensive training and support.  Ann Keen was among a small group of mothers invited to Downing Street ahead of Starmer's apology on behalf of the UK government.  "The apology to me means I'm no longer presumed guilty of something I didn't do, because I didn't give him away. He was taken," she said.

"It will prove to the world that it wasn't our fault. We weren't to blame. The state was to blame, the churches were to blame, and we will be free."

2
https://www.dailymail.com/lifestyle/article-16025029/long-lost-family-man-abandoned-birth.html

Man holds back tears as he's given a letter from his birth relatives after being abandoned in a London apartment as a baby by his religious Dutch mother 66 years ago


    David, 66, was on ITV's Long Lost Family Born Without Trace
    READ MORE: Man hunts for estranged sibling on Long Lost Family after learning his sister is actually his MUM - and he was raised by his grandparents all along
    See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source

By ELMIRA TANATAROVA, ASSISTANT LIFESTYLE EDITOR

Updated: 12:27, 4 August 2026

A man held back tears as he was given a letter from his birth relatives –fter being abandoned in a block of flats as a newborn.  In 1960, David Stevenson, tiny and cold but well fed wrapped in a rainbow of colourful knitted clothes, was found in a hallway on the second floor, outside one of the flats. At the time, his story made front-page news in the Daily Mail in an appeal to identify him, and was revisited by the newspaper in 2009 in another attempt to uncover new leads.  But for 66 years, David has lived with no knowledge of what happened to him or the circumstances that led to his abandonment, with little information in his adoption records.  But now his search to find his birth mother is finally over after ITV's Long Lost Family Born Without Trace put him in touch with her family, which is shown in the first episode.  After tracing his relatives back to the Netherlands, presenter Davina McCall gave David a letter from them, in which they explained that his mother came from a religious family and likely felt like she wouldn't be supported by her loved ones as a single mother.  A teary-eyed David said: 'I've often said I'm not looking for another family, you know. All I want to know is where did I come from?

'But seeing these and reading the letter, um, you know, I want to meet these people…That's, that's as big as it can be.'

During the episode, David got to revisit the block of flat in Golders Green where he was left in, questioning: 'Babies are often left at a police station or a hospital.  This is a locked private block.  Were some of the other residents somehow involved?'

Two family members, including a woman named Marianne agree to take DNA tests – which enabled Ariel to identify David's birth mother as a woman called Petra, who, sadly, passed away in 2010.  Marianne David's aunt and his first cousins, Saskia and Bart, told the show that the family had never even known Petra had been pregnant.  'That's just very sad to think of,' they admitted. 'A very young woman in a strange place in another country and then giving birth somewhere to a child...'

After leaving school, Petra moved to Paris where she worked as an au pair. It is thought that this explains David's French heritage – but due to strict laws around DNA testing there, it was not possible to confirm this.

She then moved to London, where she gave birth to David.  Not much is known about Petra's time in the UK, but her relatives recounted that she grew up in a strict Catholic household where news of her pregnancy would not have been tolerated.  'They would also have been very concerned with what society would think of having a child born out of wedlock,' they explained.

Petra returned to the Netherland and did not have any more children.  David was moved by hearing how much his birth mother had to go through.  'Oh wow, I find that surprising,' he shared. 'And quite sad actually you know having given up the one child that she did have.'

He then became emotional on receiving a letter from his Rotterdam relatives in which they shared that they would love to meet him and share their memories of Petra.  And that's exactly what David did. He headed straight to the Netherlands to meet, Marianne, Bart and Saskia, and another first cousin, Jan.  'One of the most rewarding thing sis to hear them talk about her,' he explained. 'It's helped me form an idea of her character.'

3
https://www.dailymail.com/crime-desk/article-16058219/UK-evil-mother-Lisa-Hayden-Johnson-pretended-son-severely-ill.html

'I was only guilty of putting my son first': Britain's 'most evil mum' who pretended her son was severely ill and forced him to use a wheelchair speaks for first time since release from jail

    To read about Jack the Ripper's astonishing link to the Freemasons and a chilling cover up sign up to The Crime Desk newsletter HERE
    What kind of cases do you want to read more about? Let us know at: crimedesk@dailymail.co.uk

By MARK DUELL, DEPUTY CHIEF REPORTER (DIGITAL)

Published: 00:01, 18 August 2026 | Updated: 09:32, 18 August 2026

Britain's 'most evil mother' who pretended her young child was severely ill to gain publicity and financial reward has claimed she was 'only guilty of putting my son first'.

Lisa Hayden-Johnson, 52, forced her son Matthew into a wheelchair and gave him unnecessary drugs to win sympathy from celebrities and charitable donations.  The mother-of-two from Brixham in Devon connected him up to an oxygen tank as part of the fabrication and met Queen Camilla, Sir Tony Blair and Simon Cowell. But her deception came crashing down when health workers and school staff told police of their concern – leading to her being jailed for more than three years in 2010. Now, Ms Hayden-Johnson has spoken on camera for the first time since her release in a new Channel 4 documentary called 'Love You To Death' airing tomorrow. Her eyes, hands and back are the only parts of her body shown during the programme.  In a trailer shared with the Daily Mail, she says of Matthew's birth: 'I always wanted to be a mum. He was such a happy baby. It was the most amazing thing.'

Ms Hayden-Johnson then adds: 'I'll answer everything that you can possibly throw at me. The only thing I was guilty of was putting my son first, and I don't regret that.'

The documentary also hears from Matthew and his sister Laura as well as doctors, police and relatives about how she subjected him to lengthy and enduring cruelty.  Laura who has complex PTSD because of nightmares featuring Matthew's cries as his feeding tubes are changed tells the programme: 'I can still hear him screaming.'

During the pretence, Ms Hayden-Johnson received free tickets to ITV's The X Factor, thousands in cash donations and benefits, went on free cruises and lobbied for Matthew to receive a national GMTV bravery award.  But she was organising a regime of medical, physiological and psychological mistreatment amounting to round-the-clock torture for the boy.  Ms Hayden-Johnson frequently described Matthew as 'the most ill child in Britain' and he became convinced he was chronically ill.  She subjected him to 325 medical encounters including inserting a feeding tube into his stomach under general anaesthetic. He had a total of nine GAs.  Ms Hayden-Johnson also claimed Matthew suffered from illnesses such as diabetes, food allergies, cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis and an intolerance to sunlight.  After being examined by medics in Devon, Bristol and London, she then forced Matthew to go to school in a wheelchair even though he could run around with his friends.  Ms Hayden-Johnson also made him wear sunglasses to protect his eyes and a bright yellow and green hat so he could be pulled to safety in case of an emergency.  She wore a green nurse's uniform at home and filled Matthew's bedroom with medical supplies and oxygen cylinders with one expert telling the documentary that the room was 'like a ward'.  Ms Hayden-Johnson even increased his blood sugar levels so tests would back her claim that he had diabetes.  Together, they met Royal Family members including Camilla, the then-Duchess of Cornwall who gave him a 'Children of Courage' medal, and Sarah Ferguson, then Duchess of York as well as a series of other celebrities and the casts of BBC shows Casualty and EastEnders.  Ms Hayden-Johnson also claimed a total of about £130,000 in benefits.  But when Matthew was six, police arrested her after health professionals and school staff met and discussed their concerns.  Following the start of an inquiry, Ms Hayden-Johnson wrongly said she had been raped near her home.  But, just as a suspect was about to be arrested, she confessed it was another lie and later admitted child cruelty as well as perverting the course of justice over the rape claim.  Police then discovered holiday videos of Matthew on a cruise ship running around in his swimming trunks and eating large meals.  When Ms Hayden-Johnson was arrested, Matthew was initially taken by social services to live with foster carers.  But he was later moved back with his sister Laura to live in Sheffield with their father, a supermarket manager who was initially taken in by his wife's deception.  Their father soon separated from Ms Hayden-Johnson who now has a new husband and does not appear in the documentary.  In the present day, Matthew, now 25, works in finance and Laura, now 27 who was diagnosed with complex PTSD has a job in childcare.  When Ms Hayden-Johnson was jailed aged 35 at Exeter Crown Court for three years and three months, judge Stephen Wildblood told her: 'There are five adjectives which describe you.  Cruel, manipulative, perverse, disordered and pitiful. Your cruel conduct traversed the fundamental rules of nature and nurture.'

Devon and Cornwall Police also said at the time that Ms Hayden-Johnson 'constantly denied being cruel to her son' and had never apologised for or explained her actions.  The Press dubbed her Britain's 'most evil mother' while Detective Constable Mark Uren described her in 2009 as a 'cruel, manipulative, evil mother who constantly lied to the medical professionals that her son was the sickest child in Britain'.

Ms Hayden-Johnson is one of Britain's most notable cases of Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIA) or Fabricated or Induced Illness (FII), formerly known as Munchausen syndrome by proxy.  This is defined by the NHS as a form of child abuse where a parent or carer exaggerates, fabricates or deliberately induces physical or mental health symptoms in a child.  The new programme comes two months after another case of suspected FII was documented by the BBC about Megan Bhari, whose mother helped her fake a brain tumour to con Brits out of £400,000 to pay for trips to Disney World.  The girl founded the Believe in Magic charity aged 16 in 2011 to help 'other' children suffering from severe or terminal illnesses, and ran it with her mother Jean O'Brien, 72 receiving the backing of various music stars.  But Megan died in 2018 from heart failure which saw an inquest confirm she did not have a brain tumour after all and investigations later claimed the girl was in fact also a victim after allegedly being duped into believing she was ill by her mother.

'Love You To Death' airs on Channel 4 at 9pm tomorrow

4
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g397rl4nzo

They became best friends then discovered they were brother and sister

North West

Published 24 July 2026

Dave Green and Andrea Urmston found they instantly hit it off when their paths crossed while working in separate roles at Manchester Airport.  The two strangers got on so well they could complete each other's sentences - which made sense when they discovered the truth.  Dave was Andrea's biological brother, but had been adopted by another family when he was a baby.  "I was shaking, I was just shaking and my heart was pounding," Andrea told the BBC. "I'd finally found him. It's unbelievable."

In 2005, Dave was managing the bus station at the airport and Andrea serviced the vending machines.  Over the next two years they became firm friends, texting and phoning each other when they were not at work.  One day during a phone call, Dave told Andrea something he had never mentioned before. He was adopted and his birth name was Stuart Proudlove.  "I kind of froze and didn't speak for a minute," said Andrea.

Her maiden name was Proudlove and she had a brother who was adopted before she was born.  "It's not a very popular name and it had to be him. Other than family, I had never heard that surname anywhere else," she added.

She immediately rang her mother, Susan, to check her long-lost brother's birth date. They matched: 24 March 1966. She called Dave straight back.  "I said 'it's got to be you, it's got to be you', and I said 'I need to see you', and so I went to pick him up," Andrea said.

As they were driving to their mother's house, Dave realised where he was. They were driving along the bus route he used to cover before becoming a manager.  His old route had taken him right past his mother's house, and the school that Andrea had attended.  He had been within touching distance of his birth family without realising.  Susan said finally meeting Dave was a surreal moment.  There were lots of tears. Then we just all hugged," said Andrea.

"I couldn't believe that I'd got my brother and my mum together, it was amazing."

Andrea's mother had told her that she had a brother when she was younger.  She told her he had been given up for adoption and had gone to a lovely lady who could not have children of her own.  "I immediately wanted to go and call him so we could play," Andrea said.

Susan said she had tried to find her son with the help of the Salvation Army, but had not got anywhere.  "I asked if we could go and get him back," Andrea said. "She did explain that it didn't work that way, so I promised her that I would find him for her one day."

Now they were finally being reunited.  "She had wanted that since being as young as I can remember," Andrea added.

"So yeah, I gave her that. I promised her that."

On the mantlepiece in Susan's home was a picture of Dave as a baby.  It had been sent by his adopted parents to his birth mother days after his adoption.  The same photograph had also been displayed in his adopted parents' house.  Dave had known since he was 10 that he was adopted, because his adoptive parents had shown him the paperwork.  But he said he had a very happy childhood, and had never harboured any desire to track down his birth mother.  "I didn't feel like I had to go searching or have any unanswered questions," he added.

'Lottery win'

For all three, finding each other has been a life-changing experience.  "I went from having really not a lot of positivity in my life at the time, to finding out that my best friend was my sister," Dave said.

"I'd found my birth mum being able to sort of make her truly happy. And I'd found a family really that I never really knew existed."

Their mother died recently, but both said they were glad she got to be reunited with her son.  "She was so desperate to find you to make sure you'd had a really good life," Andrea said.

For Andrea, the reunion was bittersweet. She had longed to find her brother for years.  "My mum and dad, they separated unfortunately and so I went through a lot of hard times knowing [Dave] was out there but I didn't know [where]."

The pair said they were now making the most of the time they have together after moving in with each other in Kidsgrove, Staffordshire.  Finding each other was, they said, their "lottery win".

5
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15975121/Surrogate-sued-abortion-Canada.html

Ugly feud between couple and surrogate mother erupts as woman who carried their son is sued after refusing to abort the fetus

    See more Daily Mail on Google save us as a Preferred Source

By MELISSA KOENIG, US REPORTER

Published: 06:55, 14 July 2026 | Updated: 12:18, 15 July 2026

A same-sex couple in Canada is suing the surrogate mother of their son, two years after she refused their request to abort the fetus.  In the suit filed in Ontario Superior Court in May, the parents allege the Ontario-based surrogate failed to keep them apprised about the baby's health, put the child at risk, caused emotional distress and violated their confidentiality, the National Post reports.  The statement of claim does not specifically mention the couple's request in June 2024 to terminate the pregnancy at 22 weeks, but both the surrogate and the head of the agency that connected the two parties said the disagreement was the first sign of any trouble.  'That's when everything changed they wanted a termination,' said Sally Rhoads-Heinrich, owner of Surrogacy in Canada Online.

The surrogate insisted more tests be conducted, and after specialists indicated that the baby was a healthy child with a relatively minor birth defect, the couple agreed to let the pregnancy continue.  But tensions escalated once again after the woman insisted on having a home birth, as was agreed upon in their contract, and later filed a small claims suit asking the parents to reimburse out-of-pocket expenses related to the pregnancy.  Shortly after she filed the small-claims suit, which has since gone to arbitration, the woman said she found out she was being sued.  The Ontario woman told the National Post she first became interested in surrogacy after seeing two close friends struggle to conceive.  'I work in an awful place,' said the surrogate, a single mother who works as a corrections officer. 'I see the worst humans in the world, and it was like something positive.'

After her profile went up on Surrogacy Canada Online's website, she said she heard almost immediately from 50 couples wanting her services, some of whom even sent flowers to her home.  Eventually, she narrowed down the prospects until she settled on the same sex couple and underwent in vitro fertilization with embryos from a donor egg and each of their sperm.  The surrogate said their rapport was positive for the first few months of the pregnancy but that all changed in late June 2024 after she informed the expectant parents that an ultrasound indicated the baby had a cleft lip, possibly a cleft palate and a minor heart defect.  She said she then received a letter from the 'intending parents' asking her to abort the fetus.  'Considering that medical tests indicate that the fetus has, or is likely to have, a genetic chromosomal or other abnormality or defect, and in accordance with article 8.5 (a) of our surrogacy agreement we want to inform you of our wish that the pregnancy be terminated,' the letter read.

'Although very difficult, this decision is free and informed.'

The surrogate was in the Dominican Republic at the time, officiating an international wrestling competition, and was left 'devastated' and a 'mess' after receiving the letter, she said.  She ultimately decided she would have agreed to have an abortion if the baby had no chance of survival after birth, but was not comfortable terminating the pregnancy over what she considered a largely cosmetic defect.  The parents then came to Toronto, where doctors at Mount Sinai Hospital which specializes in obstetric care said the baby had no problem beyond the cleft lip and was generally healthy.  At that point, the surrogate said, the parents agreed to proceed with the pregnancy.  But more conflict arose when the surrogate insisted on keeping to the original plan to have the baby delivered in a private home by midwives, and not in a hospital as the parents requested due to the cleft lip.  She said the baby had breathing problems upon delivery, but soon recovered when the midwives administered oxygen and called an ambulance to take him to the hospital. From there, the woman said the parents took the baby home and, for the most part, cut off communication with her.  Later, however, she asked the couple to reimburse her for about $10,000 in outstanding expenses, including lost income from work during the pregnancy, contributions to her pension plan she missed and transportation costs.  When she heard nothing back after repeated requests, the woman said she went to small claims court only to learn that their contract required monetary disagreements be resolved by arbitration.  Soon after, she said, came the parents' lawsuit.  It alleges that the surrogate failed to keep them abreast of the fetus's health, put the baby's health at risk by negligent behavior and 'failed to follow the [parents'] discretion regarding decisions affecting the fetus's medical care,' according to the National Post.  It also claims that the surrogate violated their confidentiality and caused serious emotional distress, with one of the parents unable to work from July 2, 2024 when the surrogate refused to have an abortion until September last year.  The lawsuit does not claim a specific amount of damages, but the surrogate said plaintiffs have indicated they're seeking about $600,000.  'You know I'm a single mom, you know I have a daughter and you're basically suing me for my house,' she lamented. 'It seems very s*****, it's just awful.  'I just feel used,' she continued. 'They didn't get the perfect child they wanted and they threw me away.'

For Rhoads-Heinrich, the saga highlights the vulnerable position of surrogates in Canada, who are legally barred from charging commercial fees unlike their counterparts in the US.   Instead, they could only be paid for receipted expenses.  Most women who decide to become surrogates in Canada therefore get pregnant simply to help others.  But sometimes, she said, they fail to get their costs paid or are left literally holding the baby when the parents walk away.  'What I find most difficult in this is they are suing the woman who brought their son to them. How is their son going to feel someday if he learns that?' Rhoads-Heinrich said of this case.

Juliet Guichon, a bioethics professor at the University of Calgary, also said the case underscores that surrogates are vulnerable under Canadian law noting that it appears the parents in this case are punishing the woman for allegedly contravening their agreement.  'Moreover, they earlier sought to end the fetus's life for a medical condition that can be completely overcome by surgery and therapy,' she said.

Based on what she knows about the case, Guichon said, 'The question arises as to whether it is in the best interests of the child to be raised by these people.'

The Daily Mail has reached out to the parents' lawyer, Jonathan Lancaster, for comment.

6
Articles / 'Government's forced adoption apology is too late'
« on: August 04, 2026, 05:21:38 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yzwq544k0o

'Government's forced adoption apology is too late'

Alice Cunningham
Suffolk

Published 3 July 2026

A man whose biological mother was forced to give him up for adoption said the government's apology was "far too late".  Reg Barker, 66, from Mildenhall, Suffolk, found out he was adopted aged 18 and later learned that his mother from Bristol had been forced to give him up by hospital staff.  An estimated 185,000 babies were taken from their mothers in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, with many women pressured into giving up their children because they were unmarried.  Sir Keir Starmer said in a statement on Thursday that the practice was "a stain on our history", but Barker stated his birth parents would never hear the apology.  I've still got to take it all in but I said recently to some other people, it's far too little, far too late," he told BBC Radio Bristol's John Darvall.

"My [birth] mother won't hear that apology. My birth father won't hear that apology.  It's far too late for all the children and all the adults involved," he said.

Barker was about three and a half years old when he was adopted, but he did not find out until he was 18 when he went to apply for a passport.  He said it had been a "complete shock" and he spent 45 years to trace his birth family.  Barker encouraged anyone who was adopted and looking for their birth family to "please do it".  "Those who have been adopted and gone through the system through forced adoption, whether it's the parent or whether it's a child, you are incredibly brave.  Nobody should feel any shame, nobody at all.  I don't want anybody anywhere in this country or abroad who's been adopted or had to go through forced adoption of their children to ever feel any shame.  I want everybody to understand you are brave," he said

Sir Keir apologised on behalf of the British state in a statement in the House of Commons on Thursday, which came after years of campaigning from mothers, adoptees and their wider families.  He said the forced adoptions were not isolated or accidental acts, but part of practices "embedded" across local authorities, religious organisations and parts of what is now the NHS.  "All institutions that operated with power over people's lives, yet they did so without compassion, without consent, and without dignity or proper safeguards" he told the Commons.

He continued: "We are deeply and profoundly sorry to the mothers who were told they were unfit, who were prevented from caring for the children they desperately wanted to help and to keep, and who have carried this loss for decades."

7
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20yq332018o

Forced adoptions 'a stain on our history' says Starmer as he gives formal apology

Ian Aikman and Tom McArthur

Published 2 July 2026

Sir Keir Starmer has apologised on behalf of the British state for its role in historical forced adoptions in England and Wales.  An estimated 185,000 babies were taken from their mothers in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, with women pressured into giving up their children because they were unmarried. In a statement in the House of Commons, Sir Keir said what happened to "tens of thousands of mothers, children and families" was "a stain on our history".  "The shame is not yours. The shame was never yours. The shame is ours," he said.

The apology comes after years of campaigning from mothers, adoptees and their wider families, and parliamentary reports into the issue.  No compensation scheme has been put in place, but a £4 million support package over three years has been announced for better access to adoption records and improved family reunion services.  Sir Keir said: "Mothers, many young, vulnerable, and without support were coerced, bullied, or misled into feeling that they had no choice but to have their children taken away from them. What a thing to do."

Sir Keir said the forced adoptions were not isolated or accidental acts, but were practices "embedded" across local authorities, religious organisations and parts of what is now the NHS.  "All institutions that operated with power over people's lives, yet they did so without compassion, without consent, and without dignity or proper safeguards" he told the Commons.

He continued: "We are deeply and profoundly sorry to the mothers who were told they were unfit, who were prevented from caring for the children they desperately wanted to help and to keep, and who have carried this loss for decades."

During the prime minister's speech, some of the birth mothers and adoptees watching from the public gallery were seen wiping away tears, while others clapped.  Conservative shadow minister Alex Burghart agreed with Sir Keir that historical forced adoption was "a stain on our history", as he added former practices are "mercifully alien to us" today.  Speaking in the Commons, Burghart said: "those beliefs have left a permanent mark on each and every one of those lives, on children separated from their mothers and on the mothers whose children were taken away."

Support groups for mothers and adopted adults will be established by the Department of Education, Sir Keir told the Commons.  Campaigners met the prime minister in Downing Street ahead of the apology.  One of those was former Labour MP Ann Keen, who told BBC Radio 4's Today programme ahead of the meeting that she was looking forward to "being released from my shame" by the apology.  Keen said she "didn't have a say" in her son's adoption after she was sent to a Swansea mother and baby home in 1966, when she was 17.  "We all need this apology because we have always been accused of giving up our babies and we didn't give them up," Keen said.

The former health minister said mothers and adoptees had been "waiting a long time" for an apology, but that the government had "done the best they could, because it's so complex".

The formal apology recognises the "lifelong trauma" endured by mothers who had their babies forcibly adopted, campaign group the Movement for an Adoption Apology said, as it also paid tribute to the many "determined women" who had long pushed for the state to say sorry.

Affected women have said public sector employees, such as doctors, nurses and social workers, were involved in pressuring them into adoption due to social stigma around being young and unmarried.  In March, a parliamentary inquiry recommended the government urgently apologise for the state's role in the practice.  The inquiry report, from the Education Committee, found that government decisions had "shaped the environment in which unmarried mothers were often shamed and coerced into having their children put up for adoption".

It called for improved access to adoption records, as well as more support for people seeking to contact or reunite with their families.  It stopped short of recommending financial redress to victims, but called on the government to "rigorously assess" how other countries had responded to historical forced adoption, including Australia, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.  A previous report from the Joint Committee on Human Rights called for a state apology in 2022. The then-Conservative government said it was "sorry on behalf of society" in 2023, but said it did not think a formal apology was appropriate "since the state did not actively support these practices".

The apology comes three years after the devolved governments in Cardiff and Holyrood said sorry to victims of forced adoption in Wales and Scotland.  An apology is also expected in Northern Ireland, but not until after the completion of a public inquiry, following a 2021 report on mother and baby institutions, Magdalene laundries and workhouses.  Previous BBC reporting into forced adoption led to the parliamentary inquiry.  Gaynor Weatherly, whose mother was 16 when she was born in 1963, told the BBC in 2021 that while she had found happiness through her own marriage and children, she felt "cheated out of a different life".  Diana Defries, who was 16 when she became pregnant, had her baby taken from her moments after she gave birth.  Also speaking to the BBC in 2021, she said: "I yelled to bring her back, but the nurse then just walked past me and put my daughter on a table out of my reach."

The Education Committee report in March also found that the state was "aided in enacting its policies by charities and religious institutions, who were, for example, responsible for the operation of mother and baby homes".

In June, the Church of England said it was "profoundly sorry" for its role in forced adoptions.  In a formal apology, the Archbishop of Canterbury Dame Sarah Mullally said victims experienced "pain and trauma and suffering and fear when you should have received care and compassion". 

She added: "You have nothing to be ashamed of. The shame is ours."

8
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-apologises-for-historic-forced-adoption-practices

Press release
Government apologises for historic forced adoption practices

Apology comes with £4 million package of support which includes easier access to adoption records

From:  Department for Education and The Rt Hon Bridget Phillipson MP
Published: 2 July 2026
   
People affected by the injustice of forced adoption have today received the formal apology they deserve, as the government acknowledged the role of the state in the appalling practice and unveiled a package of practical support worth £4 million over three years.

The Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, delivered the apology in Parliament as campaigners watched on, ahead of a reception for them in Westminster.

In a speech, the Prime Minister reflected on the harm caused to an estimated 185,000 mothers, adopted people and their wider families by practices that took place primarily between 1949 and 1976.

The apology recognises that many women were denied genuine choice, made to feel ashamed or unworthy, and that children were taken from their birth families, their identity and their history. Fathers and wider families were also affected, with harm lasting across lifetimes and, in some cases, generations.

The £4 million support fund will go towards helping people access their adoption records via the Coram BAAF charity, fund intermediary services like Family Connect that helps people reconnect with family members, and research and testimonial projects to document the long-term impact on people’s lives.

Speaking directly to campaigners watching from the House gallery, the Prime Minister Keir Starmer, said:

    The shame is not yours. The shame was never yours. The shame is ours.

    And I say that on behalf of the whole country, I say it to every single person impacted, we are deeply and profoundly sorry.

Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said:

    The pain carried by mothers, adopted children and their families who suffered this appalling injustice is unimaginable. They were cruelly denied irreplaceable moments, shared experiences and relationships which should have been theirs, and were made to feel ashamed.

    Today, on behalf of the British state, we say with one voice: this was wrong, and we are sorry. An apology cannot undo what happened, but it can be the start of real change, alongside providing the practical action, care and support that people need.

Governments funded, enabled and relied on systems that were not consistently or effectively overseen. In some cases, records were lost, altered, or not made fully accessible to those seeking answers. The state did not do enough to protect mothers, children and families and it failed to prevent harm from continuing. It bears responsibility for the systems it funded and legitimised, which enabled these practices to take place.

The Government recognises that an apology alone is not enough. Alongside today’s statement, ministers are setting out practical steps to improve support for those affected, including:

    improving access to adoption records;
    expanding services which support family reconnection;
    working with NHS England to improve access to appropriate health support, including with mental health challenges;
    developing peer support;
    strengthening awareness across public services;
    establishing a lived experience reference group to review progress; and
    commissioning a testimonials project to capture the stories of those with experience of historical forced adoption.

To ensure that lessons are learned and continue to make improvements, the government will also work to gather data on how the support announced today is working over time, keeping the need for further research under review.

This package reflects what those affected have said matters most: being able to understand their past, access records, reconnect with family where possible and receive support that recognises what they have lived through.

The apology relates to historical adoption practices in England. Scotland and Wales have each issued their own formal apologies, which the UK Government supports, while in Northern Ireland work is underway to establish a statutory public inquiry into Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses, led by the Northern Ireland Executive.

The Government recognises that some people’s experiences extend beyond the 1949 to 1976 period, and that it is deeply upsetting to hear examples where coercive practices continued. Today’s adoption system is fundamentally different, with strong legal safeguards, clear consent requirements and independent judicial oversight.

Information and support for those affected

If you have been affected by historical forced adoption practices, support is available:

    FamilyConnect offers confidential support, including counselling, record tracing and help with reunification where appropriate, and can be reached on 0300 1800 205 or https://www.familyconnect.org.uk
    For urgent support Samaritans is available 24/7 and free from any phone: 116 123.
    You can also speak to your GP, who can help you access further support.

If you are based outside England, you can still access confidential listening services such as Samaritans

ENDS

DfE media enquiries

Central newsdesk - for journalists 0203 371 4832

9
Articles / My little sister was murdered before I could ever meet her
« on: June 29, 2026, 05:28:48 PM »
https://www.dailymail.com/lifestyle/article-15923307/little-sister-murdered-meet-Vickie-adopted.html

My little sister was murdered before I could ever meet her

Seven-year-old Stacey's killer was never caught. Now, 30 years on, her sister Vickie has finally got the case reopened

By Kathryn Knight

As she walked to school on a bone-chilling January morning in 1993, the then 13-year-old Vickie Robertson saw something that stopped her in her tracks.  Pasted on to lampposts at her local bus station in Bracknell, Berkshire, were posters featuring the smiling face of a young blonde girl.  Her name was Stacey Queripel. She was seven years old and had been found dead in nearby woodland.  ‘Do you have any information?’ the poster asked.

Vickie recalls now: ‘Even though we had never met, I knew immediately who she was.’

For Stacey was not a stranger, but Vickie’s younger sister.  Removed from her dysfunctional family home at the age of just three, Vickie had been adopted but knew her birth mother had gone on to have another daughter.  She had seen photographs of Stacey over the years in one, the little girl is proudly holding a picture of the big sister she never met and had long harboured dreams of their eventual reunion.  ‘Like most people who are adopted, I’d clung to the idea of meeting a blood relative, especially a young sister. I had all these ideas about how we would be friends even if we hadn’t grown up together,’ Vickie says. ‘Now all that was gone.’

And gone in the bleakest way imaginable. Stacey had been murdered, strangled poignantly with her own plastic necklace.  The tragedy was devastating enough, but the finger of suspicion soon fell on Stacey and Vickie’s mother Gilliane, who was arrested and questioned twice although never charged.  In fact, no one has ever been brought to justice. Thirty-three years after Stacey died, her killer remains at large an injustice Vickie has dedicated her life to overturning.  ‘No family, whatever their circumstances, should have to wait 33 years for answers,’ she says.

It is one reason she is campaigning for the introduction of Stacey’s Law, which would require serious unsolved cold cases across the UK to be reviewed within five to ten years.  ‘We have so many people in this country who are forgotten and I don’t want Stacey to be just another statistic,’ Vickie says. ‘It is shocking that we do not have government guidance on case reviews that is standard across the country. Justice should not be a postcode lottery.  Stacey was a living, breathing human being with her whole life ahead of her. That was taken away from her. She was entitled to justice just as much as anybody else.’

Today, the softly spoken and personable Vickie is a 47-year-old mother of four children aged between 14 and 22. Yet, as well as a parent, she also still sees herself as the big sister to the sibling she never met.  ‘That’s the thread that weaves through my life,’ she says.

It is a life story shot through with trauma and dysfunction. Vickie’s mother was a teenager when she gave birth and did not put her father’s name on the birth certificate.  ‘To this day, I don’t know who he is,’ Vickie says.

The main male figure in their Bracknell household was her stepfather, a volatile and cruel man.  ‘I was so young that my memories are fleeting, but I remember enough and the scars on my body are a legacy of the things I can’t,’ Vickie says quietly. ‘There was a lot of violence, towards both me and my mum.’

One attack on his small stepdaughter was serious enough for him to be imprisoned for assault. Although Vickie is still trying to obtain the court records and does not know the precise details, she knows he returned home after only a few months behind bars.  Soon afterwards social services intervened and Vickie just three years old was permanently removed from the family home.  ‘I was taken away by a social worker in a yellow car,’ she says. ‘Mum didn’t even turn up to say goodbye. I remember looking through the back windscreen, hoping she would come. She never did.’

Vickie had no way of knowing it would be the last time she would ever see her mother, although Gilliane attempted to maintain some contact through social workers.  Gilliane went on to have two more children first Stacey and then another daughter, who was also subsequently adopted and whom Vickie has never met. While Stacey had a different biological father, Vickie is unsure under what circumstances she remained in the family home given her stepfather’s conviction.  Though, following the adoption, Vickie did not have direct contact with her birth mother until she was 18, occasionally photographs would be sent by Gilliane to her adoptive parents, which they could pass on to her.  For the young Vickie, they became something precious to hold on to a link to the relatives she hoped one day to know.  ‘I yearned to meet them,’ she says.

Then, aged 13, came the hammer blow when Vickie saw the poster about Stacey’s death.  ‘I didn’t know Stacey’s surname,’ Vickie says. ‘But even though I hadn’t seen a picture of her for a while, in my heart I just knew it was my sister.’

The instinct proved correct; after Vickie confided in her adoptive mother, two police officers came to the house and confirmed the dreadful truth. Stacey was, indeed, her sister - and she had been murdered.  Days earlier, on January 24, 1993, the blonde seven-year-old had apparently vanished from her family home and been reported missing by Gilliane. At around 9pm, her body was discovered in nearby woodland.  A post-mortem examination later concluded she had been strangled elsewhere with her necklace before being dumped in the woods, as investigators noted her shoes were clean despite the muddy undergrowth.  ‘I remember just feeling shock and disbelief,’ Vickie recalls.

The maelstrom of emotions was quickly compounded by news Gilliane had been arrested.  ‘I can’t explain what it felt like to see my birth mother’s face peering out from the national news linked to Stacey’s murder,’ she says. ‘I couldn’t get my head around it.’

Nor could she escape it. ‘By then it was national news and locally it was all anyone could talk about. I still lived in the same town so you couldn’t get away from it. It was everywhere – on the radio, in the newspapers, everywhere you went.’

‘Why did she die?’ screamed one headline.

It was a question that, although Vickie did not know it then, would never be answered. While there was evidence of significant dysfunction within the Queripel household the inquest later heard numerous men regularly passed through the property to smoke cannabis and Gilliane had struggled to cope with her spirited daughter the circumstances of Stacey’s death have never been fully established.  Perhaps most painfully of all, Vickie was not allowed to attend her sister’s funeral because it was being televised.  ‘Police and social workers said it was to protect my identity,’ she says. ‘I know they were trying to do the right thing, but it left me feeling so isolated and alone in my grief,’ says Vickie.

‘I felt guilty too. I was Stacey’s big sister. I should have been there to protect her. I had this strong sense that it should have been me.’

Those feelings only intensified as the weeks turned into months and no charges were brought, despite the coroner at Stacey’s inquest ruling she had been unlawfully killed.  ‘It felt like Stacey had been forgotten about,’ Vickie recalls. ‘It was a really difficult time. My adoptive family was quite tumultuous and I had all these conflicting emotions about being adopted. I felt very lost.’

There were nightmares, too, from which she would wake screaming. By the age of 15, overwhelmed by grief, confusion and feelings of abandonment, she tried to take her own life.  Thankfully she survived and today she describes it as a painful but pivotal turning point. ‘I realised I did want to be here after all,’ she says.

After leaving school at 17, Vickie began a catering apprenticeship before, in her early 20s, meeting the father of her eldest son.  By then, having turned 18, she had been given correspondence from Gilliane via her social worker.  ‘She didn’t really mention Stacey in the letters, but by then I had already decided I didn’t want anything to do with her,’ she says. ‘I wrote back to say I wasn’t interested. I knew meeting her wouldn’t give me any closure.’

She has had no contact with her birth mother since. ‘I know she is still alive, though she has moved out of the area. Beyond that, I don’t know and I don’t want to know.’

Tragically Vickie would later find herself trapped in a cycle bearing painful similarities to the one she had escaped as a child.  After separating from her eldest son's father, she met another man who initially appeared to offer safety and stability. Instead the relationship quickly became abusive.  Volatile, possessive and jealous, he controlled every aspect of her life, even ordering her to destroy photographs from her past because they were ‘disrespectful’ to him. He was also physically violent.  Looking back Vickie recognises the signs of coercive control: the gradual isolation from family and friends, the constant put-downs, the violence, followed by apologies, declarations of love and promises to change.  At the time, however, she felt trapped. Having fallen pregnant not long after they met, she went on to have three more children in the space of five years.  ‘I was either pregnant or breastfeeding,’ she says. ‘I tried to leave many times, but the post-separation abuse was so bad that it was easier to go back.  Part of me desperately wanted to believe his promises because he was the father of my children.  This cycle went on for a long time, and it is only now that I can see the desperate irony of the fact that the life I had escaped from as a child had become my normality.’

The unexpected turning point came in 2015, when Vickie saw news footage of Alan Kurdi, the two-year-old Syrian refugee whose body washed ashore after he drowned in the Mediterranean alongside his mother and brother while attempting to reach Europe.  The image shocked the world and for Vickie it sparked something deeply personal. ‘He was a very similar age to my youngest child at the time, and I was really struck by the story of a mum just wanting to get a better life for her son. It sparked something within me that made me want to look outwards.’

TWO TRAGIC SISTERS

1983 - Three-year-old Vickie, born to a teenage mum and an unknown father, is removed from the family home by social services after her violent stepfather returned to the family home after his release from jail.

1985 - Stacey is born to Gilliane, Vickie's biological mother, followed by another daughter. Stacey remains in her mother's care but her other sister, like Vickie, is adopted.

January 24, 1993, 5.30pm - Stacey is seen for the last time by her mother. The little girl apparently went to bed early after an argument.

January 24 1993, 8pm - Stacey's mother realises she isn't in her bed and reports the seven-year-old missing.

January 24, 1993, 9pm - Stacey's body is found in the grounds of South Hill Park by a police dog handler. At first it is thought that she was strangled accidentally when her plastic necklace caught on a tree, but it soon becomes clear she was murdered.

Aftermath - Stacey's mother Gilliane was arrested twice on suspicion of murder but released without charge. In 2023, a cold case review was finally opened, but Stacey's murder remains unsolved to this day.

That realisation led her to begin working with refugees and in time gave her the confidence to leave her abusive partner for good. He was eventually convicted of multiple offences, including assault by beating and stalking.  Vickie later established her own survivor-led support charity called Kaleidoscopic, which provides long-term support to hundreds of victims of domestic abuse across the country, including a specialist playgroup where mothers can connect with others who have faced similar experiences. She has received a British Empire Medal for her work with refugees and domestic violence sufferers.  And, in what she describes as a ‘full-circle moment’, one of those support groups takes place close to where Stacey’s body was found.  ‘I’ve created a place of safety in a place that held such terrible memories and that feels wonderful,’ she says.

Stacey’s grave lies nearby, a simple headstone beneath a statue of a young girl holding out her hands.  Vickie tends it lovingly, just as she tends her sister’s memory with equal devotion, telephoning Thames Valley Police every year to ask about the state of the investigation into her death. Every year she was told little had changed.  Then, three years ago, with the support of her local MP James Sunderland, she was informed a cold case review was finally being opened.  It was a victory of sorts but, as Vickie points out, three years on she still appears no closer to the answers she has waited decades for.  ‘Every year that passes makes it less likely that someone will be held accountable,’ she says.

It is one reason she has campaigned so passionately for Stacey’s Law.  ‘Some police forces regularly review unsolved cases but others don’t, and justice shouldn’t depend on where you happen to live,’ she says.

While she cannot discuss details of the case because of the ongoing review, Vickie does not believe her birth mother was responsible. ‘What she knew or didn’t know, I cannot say. But I do not believe she killed my sister,’ she says.

‘I will fight until my last breath to make sure Stacey isn’t forgotten. People talk about cold cases as though they’re files gathering dust on a shelf. But Stacey wasn’t just a case. She was my little sister.’

* To support Stacey’s Law visit petition.parliament.uk/petitions/765952

10
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15912019/My-13-year-old-asked-you-mum-sister-STACE-DON-hoped-incestuous-family-secret-stay-hidden-reveals-pride-daughter-refuses-ashamed.html

My 13-year-old asked, 'Are you my mum or my sister?': STACE DON hoped her incestuous family secret could stay hidden. Now she reveals her pride in her daughter who refuses to be ashamed

    READ MORE: Boy, 3, 'attacked by at least one crocodile' after being 'thrown into zoo pit by man with learning difficulties who broke away from carers' - as suspect 'not fit for interview' is bailed
    See more Daily Mail on Google give us as a Preferred Source

By ANN CUSACK

Published: 11:30, 20 June 2026 | Updated: 11:30, 20 June 2026

Kadie Don clearly remembers the shocking moment her mother explained she had become pregnant by her own father, and that she was the child from that pregnancy.   Aged 13, confused and shocked, Kadie asked: 'So are you my mum or my sister now?'

As a bewildered child, she struggled to make sense of it. But five years on, Kadie, now 18, is speaking out with the aim of supporting other children who live with trauma.  Kadie, from Oldham, says: 'I've never met anyone in the same situation as me and it can be a lonely place.  I want to be there for other kids, to let them know they are not on their own. Knowing the truth has ultimately brought me and Mum so much closer. People say how alike we are but they have no idea just how much we share.'

Kadie's mother, Stace Don, 37, was physically and mentally abused by her natural father, Nigel Taylor.  She spent much of her childhood in foster care and her brief spells staying with him were scarred by neglect and cruelty.  Aged 17, she went to stay with Taylor for Christmas because she had nowhere else to go. But he took away her bank card and phone and refused to let her leave for six months afterwards.  On the eve of her 18th birthday in April 2007 Taylor forced himself on her and she fell pregnant.   Despite Taylor trying to coerce her into having a termination, Stace bravely continued with her pregnancy and Kadie was born in February 2008.  Stace had no further contact with her father but when Kadie was two and a half, she went to the police and made a complaint.  Taylor was jailed for seven years in April 2011 at Basildon Crown Court after admitting sexual activity with a child family member.  He was ordered to sign the sexual offenders' register and ordered to stay away from Stace. A charge of rape was left to lie on file.  Meanwhile Kadie grew up not knowing who her father was.  She says: 'Mum was brilliant. When I was small, she painted a princess bedroom for me. She made a big fuss at Christmas and birthdays. I went to dance class and acting lessons. I didn't even question who my dad was; Mum was enough.'

But by the age of 13, she was becoming curious.  She says: 'Mum never let me play out or go on sleepovers. She was overprotective and I didn't know why.  I wanted to know why I didn't have a dad, or a grandfather. Even my friends from single parent families knew who their dads were but I didn't even know his name.  One Saturday morning, I got up early and I was halfway out of the window, off to meet my friends, when Mum caught me.  She agreed to give me a little bit of freedom, just on our street. She let me go to the corner shop one day and I was followed by a man in a white van. I ran home, screaming.  Mum was so afraid, she had always worried about him tracking us down, and so she finally had to tell me the truth.  I was only 13 and I couldn't take it in. I asked: "Does that make you my sister?" which really upset her.  I rebelled, insisting I wanted to meet him to make up my own mind. I didn't doubt he was a bad person but I wanted to see that for myself.   Mum agreed I could meet a paternal aunt who told me Nigel Taylor was a West Ham fan and I really wanted to know more details about him. It was part of my identity, no matter how difficult.  But when she said I looked like him, I was appalled. I didn't want that, I didn't want any physical connection with him.'

For several years, Kadie kept the truth about her natural father hidden.  She says: 'Mum tried to get support from social services, but they said they'd never come across a case like ours before. They didn't know what to suggest or how to support us.  As time went on, Mum told me more, explaining she had been raised in foster care because her parents could not look after her.  But in her teens, Nigel Taylor, her father, took her to live with him. He was physically, mentally and sexually abusive to her.  And on the eve of her 18th birthday he forced himself on her and she fell pregnant. Mum told me she loved me from that first moment.'

Taylor had allegedly threatened to kill Stace if she ever admitted he was the father of her child.  Kadie says: 'That was why Mum was so protective. She was living in fear that he would one day find us.  I'd always known Mum was strong. But hearing what she'd been through, I was overwhelmed. I understood why she had kept the truth from me for as long as she could.'

But the revelation weighed heavy on Kadie also. Like Stace, she became anxious and overprotective.  Kadie says: 'I looked after my mum, as she looked after me. With no support for either of us, I became a young carer. Mum was open about what she had been through, but I wasn't ready to speak out.  I confided in a school friend and he told everyone, which was devastating at the time. Some kids were quite cruel. But mostly, people were very supportive and I was glad it was out there. I realised I had nothing to be ashamed of and nothing to hide.'

Aged 18, Kadie has just finished a college course in health and social care. Stace has launched 'Safe, Seen and Heard', a series of preventative programmes to educate and support teenagers and adults, raising awareness of healthy boundaries and safe spaces.  Kadie says: 'I would like to support children and teenagers through trauma; nobody should feel alone. Mum is incredibly strong and loving and she is a survivor. I am proud when people say how alike we are.'

Stace says: 'I'm really proud of Kadie speaking out and think she is incredible. I've always protected her but Kadie has been affected by the aftermath of my trauma and the complexities.  I advocate for people to speak out and I think my daughter is so brave. Now she is 18 I want her to have her voice and not be silenced.'

The family's story is told in My Girl, a book written by Stace Don: www.thelifeofstacedon.org.uk

11
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyp77l79e9o

How adoptive parents' lies unravelled to reveal 'reign of terror'

Lauren Hirst North West.

Published 15 June 2026

As Jamie Varley begged medics to save the life of his adopted 13-month-old son, he told them: "It's my fault I left him for literally two minutes while I went and got changed."

This was not an admission of guilt, but the start of Varley's web of lies.  The truth behind Varley's months of deceit only came to light when his baby Preston Davey died in hospital on 27 July 2023 after months of sexual and physical abuse at the hands of the 37-year-old former teacher.  After an eight-week trial at Preston Crown Court, Varley - who had maintained that Preston drowned in the bath was found guilty of murdering him, and a string of other offences including sexual assault and taking indecent images of the child he was trusted to care for.  Varley's partner John McGowan-Fazakerley, 32, was also convicted of allowing the death of a child, child cruelty and sexual abuse.  For Lancashire Police Det Ch Insp Andy Fallows, who was the senior investigating officer on the case, Varley's behaviour in hospital was "almost like a pantomime".

"We see a very different Jamie Varley at different stages," said Fallows.

"The jury has seen him on that evening [in hospital], throwing himself to the floor saying that he didn't believe it was true it felt very contrived.  We saw a very different Jamie Varley in the suspect interviews on 25 June 2025 just before he was charged, both in terms of appearance, demeanour and attitude.  I think we saw a different Jamie Varley giving evidence during his trial: obstructive, wholly inconsistent and wholly unbelievable.  Jamie Varley is a manipulator.  He has sought to change his account, frustrate and blame other people when the truth was there right in front of him.  He had caused those injuries and he had killed Preston Davey."

Preston, who had been taken into care when he was five days old, and nine months later, in April 2023 was adopted by Varley and McGowan-Fazakerley.  After Preston began living at their home in Blackpool in Lancashire he began to suffer non-accidental "cluster" injuries of bruising, seizures or respiratory failures, and there was evidence of abnormality of his anatomy.  On 27 July 2023, he was rushed to Blackpool Victoria Hospital by Varley, who had taken a year off work as head of year at a high school, to adopt him.  He told medical staff he had left the child in the bath for two or three minutes and returned to find him submerged.  Medics were unable to revive Preston, and he was pronounced dead in hospital.  A post-mortem examination found 40 external and internal trauma injuries to the child's body, with some consistent with "forcible penetration" and sexual abuse, ruling out drowning as a cause of death.  "My view is that the bath incident never happened at all, as Preston wasn't wet," said Fallows.

"There was no evidence of drowning, no evidence in the autopsy that Preston had swallowed water. It was wholly inconsistent.  Preston Davey had been sexually abused, probably twice on that particular day, in really tragic circumstances. And ultimately that has contributed to his death."

Fallows said over the course of the trial the jury was shown many examples of psychological and emotional abuse as well.  He described "keeping a clearly tired sleeping baby awake for no other purpose other than amusement" and "leaving a baby in a bath for 14 minutes whilst videoing it" among the ways Preston was tormented.

"It was almost like a sordid amusement that Jamie Varley has treated Preston as a plaything, as his property. And that poor child has been subject to a reign of terror."

The senior investigating officer said while it was true McGowan-Fazakerley, a financial sales manager, was in work on the day Preston died, he had been taking a "hear no evil see no evil" approach.  "He saw and cared for Preston Davey on a daily basis," said Fallows.

"He must have seen a significant amount of injuries over that four-month period.  He knew that Preston had suffered a fracture to his arm.  He must have seen bite marks to Preston Davey's buttocks because photographic evidence was taken with his mobile phone.  He wasn't there on the evening, but he should have known."

Evidence showed that Preston "had a happy, settled, content life for the first nine months of his life in the care of foster parents who clearly loved him deeply".

Fallows said the police investigation had not looked at what "could have or should have happened by other agencies" but focused on prosecuting the two men.  In the months before his death, Preston was taken to hospital three times.  Firstly for a nose bleed and seizure, for the second time with a rash and bruising and on the third occasion with a fractured left elbow.  When social workers visited Preston at home, they did not feel that he was in danger.  "I'm the investigating officer in relation to a murder investigation," said Fallows, when questioned on whether alarm bells should have been raised.

"Here and now, it should be about Preston Davey.  Those questions will naturally be picked up by other people at a later date."

Fallows also said the investigation had not revealed any evidence to suggest the men had a sexual interest in children prior to the adoption.  "We looked into the background of both and we've not uncovered any evidence that would suggest that either of them have had a sexual interest in children or uncovered any evidence that would suggest that they have previously been abusive to children or were in any way a danger to children," said Fallows.

"In fact up to the point that they've become Preston's adopted parents, they were presented as men of good character.  Again, the reality was rather different.  Did Jamie Varley source a child in order to sexually abuse and murder?  That isn't the evidence in the case, and it isn't the case that we presented.  I suppose the only person that will ever know that is Jamie Varley, but people may come to their own conclusions after following the evidence in the trial."

12
https://www.dailymail.com/crime-desk/article-15519449/Granddaughter-penultimate-woman-hanged-Britain-murder-London.html

I was given up for adoption as a baby and was always curious about my real family then I found out they had a dark secret

    Caroline Muirhead got engaged to a killer then a made a mistake she could not take back. To find out what happened next sign up to The Crime Desk newsletter HERE
    What kind of cases do you want to read more about? Let us know at: crimedesk@dailymail.co.uk
    See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source

By AIDAN RADNEDGE, SENIOR NEWS REPORTER

Published: 11:51, 7 June 2026 | Updated: 13:23, 7 June 2026

Stephanie Howarth grew up as a child with loving parents in Herne Bay, a quaint town on the Kent coast, but when she looked in the mirror she had a sense that she was different from her family.  Her olive skin and dark hair stood out against the pale complexion of her parents and when she turned eight years old her mother and father decided to tell her why she was adopted.  Such news could rock the foundations of even the closest family but Stephanie continued to live a happy life with her 'lovely' adopted parents cherishing their affection and care.  Yet, she was forever curious about her biological family and despite fighting pangs of guilt, she began a long journey to find the truth scouring libraries across the UK to discover more about her mother and father.  Little did she know that hidden in her adoption papers was a sinister secret linking her to one of Britain’s most notorious female killers, a celebrity executioner and a street with a dark past.  Stephanie uncovered a family link to Styllou Christofi, who was executed at north London's Holloway Prison in 1953 after killing her daughter-in-law Hella.  Stavros Christofi, Stephanie's father, had three children with Hella before another four in his second marriage. Stephanie was born of an affair in between the two relationships in 1956.   Stephanie told The Crime Desk: 'I never met my birth father. It was difficult to know what I felt when I found out.  It's quite a thing to find out you're adopted and inevitably there will be a sad story behind it. My discovery had the extra element of hearing about murder and hanging.  There was a piece of paper with the names of my birth parents and the occupation and address of my birth father.  I went to a library in Manchester and found some notes one of them was connected to my birth mother and a lot of things fell into place and there were family members to contact.'   

She adds: 'It's very strange. I'm happy to tell people I'm Styllou's granddaughter, although I didn't used to.  Some people step back when it comes up you should see their reactions, they're shocked.  'I've been told, "I wouldn't tell anyone about that" but it's not something connected with me. I'm not her.'

At her Old Bailey trial starting in October 1954, Christofi's lawyers argued defence by insanity but this was rejected by a jury who found her guilty of murder and she was hanged at Holloway prison on December 15 that year.  Stephanie uncovered a family link to Styllou Christofi, who was executed at north London's Holloway Prison in 1953 after killing her daughter-in-law Hella.  Stavros Christofi, Stephanie's father, had three children with Hella before another four in his second marriage. Stephanie was born of an affair in between the two relationships in 1956. Researching her family, Stephanie discovered that her Greek-Cypriot grandmother was no stranger to violence and had been found guilty in Cyprus in 1925 for murdering her mother-in-law having thrust a lighted torch down the victim's throat.  Christofi is said to have argued frequently with her daughter-in-law after arriving from Cyprus to live with her son and his family in 1953 12 years after Stavros had moved to London.  Reports at the time of her trial told of her resenting the fact Stavros and German-born fashion model Hella were bringing up their three children as English.  The murder in July 1954 came as Hella was preparing to take the children on a trip to her native Germany, while Stavros wanted to persuade his mother to return to Cyprus.  Stavros had left for work at London's Cafe de Paris on the evening of July 29 1954 and the children had been put to bed, when Christofi approached Hella from behind in the kitchen and knocked her unconscious with a blow to her head with a metal pan.  The killer then strangled her victim, removed Hella's wedding ring and moved the body to the garden where she poured on paraffin and started a fire. A neighbour saw her setting alight to Hella's body in the family's garden but inexplicably did not raise an alarm.  Christofi then ran into the street to raise the alarm as the flames flared out of control.  When police were called, the neighbour who had passed by earlier thinking a mannequin had been on fire told officers what he saw.  A subsequent search of the home found Hella's wedding ring in Christofi's bedroom. She could provide no explanation about the ring's whereabouts, while also telling officers questioning her: 'I wake up, smell burning, go downstairs. Hella burning. Throw water, touch her face. Not move. Run out, get help.'

At her Old Bailey trial starting in October 1954, Christofi's lawyers argued defence by insanity but this was rejected by a jury who found her guilty of murder and she was hanged at Holloway prison on December 15 that year.  While Stephanie never knew her biological father, she has at least learnt family stories about him including his brush with Hollywood star Marlene Dietrich when she visited central London's Café de Paris, while working as a maître d’ in the 1940s and 1950s.  Ms Howarth said: 'My father found himself taken away in a taxi with Marlene Dietrich.  She was pursued by photographers and asked him to fold her coat over her to hide.'

But there were further twist and turns for Stephanie to discover in her family story this time linking her grandmother to one of Britain’s most infamous female killers, Ruth Ellis.  Coincidentally, both Christofi and Ellis carried out their murders in the 1950s in the very same street South Hill Park in Hampstead, north London.  Hella's death was just 11 months before Ellis shot her lover David Blakely outside the Magdala pub in Hampstead, just 100m from Christofi's home.  South Hill Park has subsequently become the address of celebrities including Bill Oddie, Terry Gilliam, Jonathan Ross, Frank Skinner and David Baddiel with comic Skinner darkly remarking on his podcast how it looks on the map like the shape of a noose.  Albert Pierrepoint, the hangman who executed both women at Holloway prison, later commented sympathetically on how the Greek-Cypriot woman's death was downplayed by contrast.  Ellis was hanged by Pierrepoint on July 13 1955 seven months after the same fate at the same jail for Christofi, on December 15 1954.  He gave the riposte: 'Why weren't you waiting to ask me that question last year, sonny? Wasn't Mrs Christofi a woman too?'

Pierrepoint, writing in his 1974 biography, Executioner: Pierrepoint, noted how Ellis as a 'blonde night-club hostess' captured more intrigue than 'a grey-haired and bewildered grandmother who spoke no English'.

Speaking of the grandmother she never met, Stephanie expressed some sympathy for the difficulties faced back in those post-war years arriving in Britain.  She said: 'She came over all alone probably illiterate. She didn't speak English all the way she went through the court system.  She came from a tiny community in Cyprus, Greek Orthodox, very strict. Policing came in the families there.  I don't think people quite realise what happens with hanging, just how absolutely brutal it is.'

Christofi and Ellis were both buried in unmarked graves at Holloway then exhumed in 1971 along with three other female murderers of the 20th century.  These included Edith Thompson, executed in 1923 for the murder of her husband Percy.  Also interred at Holloway then disinterred at the same time were 'baby farmers' Amelia Sach and Annie Walters, who had been hanged at the jail in February 1903 after being found guilty of murdering infants in East Finchley, north London.  All were transferred to Brookwood Cemetery in Surrey in 1971 except for Ellis, whose remains were returned to her family.  Thompson was exhumed in 2018 and buried in her family plot beside her mother.  It has been Ellis's case that drew the most attention, not only in headlines at the time but in subsequent film and TV recreations.  These have included the 1985 movie Dance With A Stranger, starring Miranda Richardson, and last year's ITV docudrama series A Cruel Love with Lucy Boynton in the leading role.  Now, looking back after her research into the Christofi case, Stephanie added: 'All I wanted to do was found out why I looked like I did, what the situation was.  I'm not sure if I ever really found what I was looking for but I know that my olive skin is inherited from the Greek side of the family.  It has been commented on that I have a Greek look about me, particularly in that photograph.  I still wonder whether I look like my birth father or even my birth grandmother.'

13
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y0xz424v1o

Adoptive dad 'ashamed' of photos he took of baby, murder trial hears
Yunus Mulla
North West, Reporting from Preston Crown Court
Published 21 May 2026

A teacher accused of murdering a baby boy he had adopted has told a jury he never hurt or sexually abused the infant.  Jamie Varley denies the murder of 13-month-old Preston Davey.  The 37-year-old, from Blackpool, also denied taking photographs or videos as "trophies" of sexual abuse, but told jurors at Preston Crown Court that he felt "disappointed" and "really ashamed" at some of the images he had taken on his phone.  Varley is alleged to have routinely sexually, physically and emotionally abused the baby he had adopted with his 32-year-old partner John McGowan-Fazakerley. Both men deny all charges against them.  In the fourth week of their trial, Varley gave evidence in his own defence for the first time.  Nick Johnson KC, defending Varley, began by asking: "On 27 July 2023, did you kill Preston Davey by deliberately blocking his airway?"

"No, I did not," Varley replied.

Johnson continued: "Did you sexually assault that child in any way? Did you ever willfully harm Preston physically or psychologically?"

Varley replied: "Absolutely not, our son has never been sexually abused. No."

Jurors were told Preston began living with the defendants at their home in Blackpool on 1 April 2023.  The prosecution allege Preston was routinely ill-treated, had indecent images and videos taken of him, and was sexually abused and physically assaulted.  The court heard Varley, who said he had severe dyslexia, became a design and technology teacher and head of year at a high school before meeting his partner.  Varley said: "I had always thought about having kids. I wanted to be a teacher, a daddy. just never thought it was possible once I realised I was a gay man.  John was everything I had ever asked for in a relationship. My whole life just changed when I met John."

Varley said the "early stages" of adoption had been an "eye opener" and that Preston was neither a good sleeper nor in a routine.  He added: "It was challenging in the sense it was new to us.  I felt because I had more experience than John, I felt it was going to be a breeze. But it wasn't."

Varley was asked to explain a text he had sent to his sister about Preston in which, after a sleepless night, he had written: "He's dead meat".

Varley said: "It was just language that I use. In social settings I'm dramatic. Sassy. I just easily throw words about."

He told jurors he had bonded with the baby better than he had expected, as he did not think he could love anything more than his dog, Max.  But his love for Preston exceeded that for his pet, he said.  He added: "When we got the little one, it was special. It was quick. It was strong."

Johnson then asked Varley about photographs of bruises on Preston, who appeared to have a "cluster" of them on his forehead, which child sex abuse expert Dr Joanne Gifford had described as a "red flag".  Varley said Preston, who was learning to crawl, would often bang his head and have little mishaps daily.  He denied ever deliberately bruising the child.  Johnson asked about a photograph of Preston playing naked in a paddling pool, which Home Office pathologist Dr Alison Armour said showed a shaded mark on the child's bottom which resembled a human bite mark.  Johnson said: "Did you ever bite Preston's bottom? What do you say to the suggestion you bit him and took a photo?"

Varley replied: "Absolutely not. Could not be more wrong."

'Very unsafe'

Johnson asked Varley about a series of photos on his phone of Preston in his cot, along with two toy teddy bears, four days before his death on 27 July 2023.  The images stretch over a period of three minutes and 12 seconds, with the child's head and arms over the top horizontal bar of his cot and his neck resting on the bar.  His body is apparently partially suspended, his legs in a "frog like" position and the child seemingly asleep or unconscious, described to the jury earlier as a "very unsafe" and "dangerous" position.  Varley said Preston had gone to sleep before in "funny positions" and, because he had done so again, he had taken pictures.  Johnson said: "Were these trophies of a sexual encounter?"

"No they were not, no," Varley replied. "I did not even recognise, at the moment, it was inappropriate.  I'm disappointed. I feel shamed. I feel really ashamed.  I did not mean to cause any distress, any harm in that moment. I felt he was safe.  I just wanted to capture him, all of his life. I just wanted to capture every part of his life."

Preston was rushed to hospital on 27 July 2023, having suffered a collapse and cardiac arrest, allegedly following a sexual assault by Varley.  Varley told police he had briefly left the child in the bath and when he returned Preston was off his bath seat and submerged.  The court has heard previously that a post-mortem examination had ruled out drowning and found multiple non-accidental internal and external injuries.  Preston's cause of death was found to be acute upper airway obstruction by either smothering or an object or objects inserted into his mouth.  The jury has heard some injuries to Preston were clinical signs of sexual abuse.  Varley denies murder, manslaughter, two counts of assault by penetration, five counts of cruelty to a child, grievous bodily harm, sexual assault of a child, 13 counts of taking indecent photographs or videos of a child, one of distributing an indecent photograph of a child, to his co-accused, and one of making an indecent photograph.  McGowan-Fazakerley denies allowing the death of a child, three counts of child cruelty and one count of the sexual assault of a child.  The trial has been adjourned until Friday.  Post-mortem, 40 traumatic injuries were found on his body.

14
Articles / Boy's adoption overturned after mum dates prisoner
« on: May 12, 2026, 11:35:14 AM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx21q2d2y3ro

Boy's adoption overturned after mum dates prisoner

Jonny Manning
North East and Cumbria

Published 11 May 2026

A two-year-old boy's adoption has been overturned after his adoptive mother failed to disclose she was in a relationship with an inmate at the prison where she worked.  In the Court of Appeal ruling, Lord Justice Peter Jackson said the boy was formally adopted by a married couple in Northumberland in November 2025.  However, the child's former social workers were recently told his adoptive father had moved out in October and his mother had begun a new relationship.  Barristers acting for Gateshead Council said the adoption was "unfair to the child" as it had been based on "mistaken" information.  The judge said the prisoner was in custody for drug offences and had previous convictions for battery and possession of weapons.  Jackson said the prisoner had also been accused of child sex offences, but no action was taken against him.  He was released in March but was returned to prison in April for breaching his licence conditions, after he was arrested over allegations of threatening behaviour and criminal damage at the adoptive mother's home, the judge said.

Adoption 'errors'

Social workers also learned the woman was caring for the prisoner's XL bully dog and had twice taken the child to visit the prisoner, who had begun referring to him as his "stepson".  The boy was removed from the mother's care in March and was placed with his adoptive father, before Gateshead Council sought to have the adoption overturned.  Neither his adoptive or birth parents attended the hearing.  His adoptive mother had previously told the council she did not want "any further involvement" with the child. Jackson said the boy had received a "high standard of care" from his adoptive parents, who social workers said loved him "unconditionally".  "The consequence of each of these errors was that the court acted on a fundamentally mistaken basis," he said.

Jackson said the adoption decision was not the fault of the original family court judge, who made it based on the information before her at the time.  The case will return to the family court to be dealt with at a later date.

15
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/09/church-of-england-formal-apology-forced-adoptions

Church of England expected to formally apologise for its role in forced adoptions

Survivors of UK’s mother and baby home scandal welcome news after long campaign for recognition

The Church of England is expected to make a formal apology for its role in forced adoptions and the UK’s mother and baby home scandal.  Survivors of the scandal in which hundreds of thousands of children were forcibly separated from their mothers have welcomed the news after years of campaigning for recognition.  The church ran and was linked to scores of institutions across the country where unmarried pregnant women were sent to have babies in secret in the postwar era before the infants were handed over to married couples, who in some cases had made donations to “moral welfare” organisations involved.  Anglican mother and baby homes were part of a network of properties nationwide, including homes run by the Catholic church and the Salvation Army, which worked alongside statutory agencies. Women and children faced abuse and neglect in the system, but the Westminster government has never formally apologised for its role.  The BBC reports that an “early draft” of an apology from the Church of England said: “We acknowledge the lifelong impact of these experiences and the part the church played in a system shaped by attitudes and behaviours that we now recognise as harmful. For the pain and trauma experienced and still carried by many women and children in church-affiliated mother and baby homes, we are deeply sorry”.

A 2021 parliamentary inquiry found there were 185,000 adoptions involving unmarried mothers in England and Wales between 1949 and 1973 alone and that the state was ultimately responsible for the suffering caused by public institutions and employees involved.  Because the last mother and baby homes closed in the late 1980s and records are incomplete, campaigners say many more people were affected.  Phil Frampton, a writer and campaigner from Manchester, was born in an Anglican institution in 1953 because his parents had been in a mixed heritage relationship. His Nigerian father, a mining engineering researcher, was removed from the country after it became known, while his white British mother, a grammar school teacher from Birmingham, was sent to the Rosemundy mother and baby home in St Agnes, Cornwall.  Frampton said: “A lot of survivors will be delighted. What’s coming is a big victory after all the campaigning people have done over the last 20 years providing that the wording is not mealy-mouthed and designed to protect the church. It will not be good enough for the church to say they were guided by the morality of they time they were supposed to set the morality of the time and they did that by their actions.  The church and state were the principal supporters of forced adoptions and they should be compensating all the survivors for the hell they put them through. If the church is fully open on this, under the new archbishop of Canterbury, then this is part of the pressure on the UK government to apologise. The UK is way behind in making an apology and providing access to records for survivors to find their children and parents, to bring closure and new beginnings.”

Research by Dr Michael Lambert of Lancaster University has indicated the use of the lactation-suppressing drug diethylstilbestrol, which has been linked to an increased risk of cancers, in some unmarried mothers’ homes, while an ITV investigation has revealed unmarked graves across England contain the bodies of babies who did not survive.  Giving evidence to the education select committee last month, the children and families minister, Josh MacAlister, acknowledged that the UK state “had a role” in historical forced adoptions and said the case for a formal apology was “being actively considered”.  The governments of Ireland, Scotland and Wales have all previously issued apologies, as have the Salvation Army and the head of the Catholic church in England and Wales.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 53