Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Forgotten Mother

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 49
1
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15174551/German-mayor-stabbed-adopted-daughter-17-police-believe-finding-bloodied-knife-clothes.html

German mayor 'was stabbed by adopted daughter, 17', police believe after finding bloodied knife and clothes

By PERKIN AMALARAJ, FOREIGN NEWS REPORTER

Published: 18:34, 8 October 2025 | Updated: 23:23, 8 October 2025

The newly elected mayor of a German town who was found at her home with stab wounds is believed to have been attacked by her teenage daughter, investigators said.  Iris Stalzer, 57, was voted in as the mayor of Herdecke on September 28 and is due to take office on November 1.  Police said emergency services were alerted shortly after midday on Tuesday by her daughter, who reported that Ms Stalzer had been seriously wounded outside her house in an attempted robbery.  Officers went to the house, where they found Ms Stalzer sitting in a chair with at least 13 stab wounds and determined that the attack appeared to have happened indoors.   She was flown to a hospital by helicopter, having suffered serious injuries, including a wound to her lung. Police said on Wednesday that she is now out of danger.  Investigators found two knives and clothing in the house, which are believed to have been used in the attack, and detained Ms Stalzer's 17-year-old daughter and 15-year-old son.  The evidence was found in her son's bedroom. Investigators also found that large blood stains appeared to have been removed before emergency services were called, though these were visible upon a deep inspection, according to Bild.  When questioned on Tuesday evening, Ms Stalzer pointed to her daughter as the suspect, police investigator Jens Rautenberg said.  There was no immediate information on the nature of the family conflict that preceded the stabbing.

2
General Discussion / Parents trying to conceive after adoption
« on: October 08, 2025, 12:11:41 PM »
Articles on parents trying to conceive after an adoption exist, though the research primarily focuses on the profound and enduring grief and health consequences experienced by parents. Studies show that for many, the force/illegl/decision to place a child for adoption involves ongoing feelings of maternal loss and physical/mental health impacts. While less information is available about parents' desires to have more children, existing data indicates this is a topic connected to the ongoing trauma of the adoption experience and the continued desire for a family.

Key Themes in the Literature

Disenfranchised Grief:
*  A significant theme in research on parents is the concept of disenfranchised grief, where their loss is not fully recognized or supported by society, leading to long-term emotional distress.
 Health and Well-being:
*  Research consistently points to continuing negative physical and mental health consequences for mothers following adoption, such as ongoing feelings of loss and inadequate self-worth.
 Attachment to the Unborn Child:
*  Even when a mother knows she will not be keeping the baby, deep maternal bonds can form, leading to lasting love and a desire to parent.
Limited Research on Post-Adoption Conception:
*  While there's extensive literature on the parent experience of loss and grief, research specifically detailing post-adoption family building and desire for more children is less common.

Finding Relevant Resources

Search Terms:
*  When looking for these types of articles, use terms such as "(natural) mother grief," "(natural) father experience adoption," "loss of child adoption consequences," and "(natural) parent trauma".

Academic Databases:
Utilize databases like National Institutes of Health (NIH) and ScienceDirect.com to access studies on the lasting effects of adoption on birth parents.
Adoption Organizations:
Check resources from adoption support organizations, which often provide articles and information on the adoption experience from various perspectives.

3
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-15154935/Woman-long-lost-brother-30-years-mothers-dying-wish-meeting-him.html

'I loved you and didn't want to let you go': Mother's heartbreaking message from beyond the grave to son she was forced to give up for adoption as family find him after 30-year search

    Jayne meets her brother in this week's episode of Long Lost Family
    READ MORE: Scottish woman's heartbreak as she tracks down her birth mother after 50 years - only to find out she doesn't want to meet

By ALANAH KHOSLA, FEMAIL REPORTER

Published: 11:03, 2 October 2025 | Updated: 17:54, 2 October 2025

A woman whose older brother was put up for adoption has revealed her joy at finally meeting him after a 30-year search fulfilling their mother's dying wish.  Jayne Hadlow, 60, from Essex, met her brother Andrew for the first time this year.  The pair's mother Kathleen was unmarried when she had Andrew at the age of 21, and to her heartbreak, her strict Catholic parents put her son who she'd named Jeffrey up for adoption behind her back.  In 1994, at the age of 53, Kathleen sadly died of cancer, and her final wish was for Jayne to find her firstborn and tell him that he was loved.  'I still know that it hurt Mum to the depths of her soul to let him go,' Jayne told tonight's episode of ITV's Long Lost Family.

'She carried it with her for the rest of her life.'

'One of the final things she spoke about was Jeffery, and she said, "Jayne, when I'm gone, can you please find him for me; can you please tell him what happened, and tell him that I loved him and that I didn't want to let him go". She held my hand and she said, "Please, please make sure that you do it".'

Growing up, Jayne and her two younger brothers, Stephen and Jamie, were unaware of Andrew's existence.  But when she was 19, Jayne's life changed forever when her mother told her the truth.  Jayne explained, 'Mum was 21 when she had Jeffery. He was born two years before me. She went home one day and he wasn't there. My grandparents had the baby adopted. I can't imagine the pain of that. She carried that every single day.'

Kathleen was always the life and soul of the party, but there was one day each year when her mood and behaviour completely changed.  Their late father would always take Jayne and her siblings out on bonfire night, but Kathleen always refused to come.  The children would see her the next day and see that she was upset, her face swollen from crying.  Jayne explained, 'Bonfire night every year my father would take us out. We were just super excited to see the fireworks with dad, it was great.'

Despite the festive fun, they would always question why their mother wouldn't come. 'She wasn't her usual bright self.  We'd come back and mum would be in the bedroom and we wouldn't really see her until the next day. We could always tell she'd been upset and crying.'

It wasn't until Jayne was 19 that she discovered the reason behind her mother's sadness.  'She just said to me one day, 'I need to tell you something, you've got a brother; his name is Jeffery, and I had him adopted, well, I didn't have him adopted, he was adopted.  Jeffery was born on the 6 November, 1962. Bonfire night was the night that would bring all those memories back. Now I understand why she was so upset at that time of year.'

Piecing together her family's past, she visited her mother's home in Liverpool, where she was raised.  She said, 'My grandparents were not happy at all at mum being pregnant and not being married. They were very strict Catholics. They sent her away to the Isle of Wight. They were basically trying to hide it.'

Kathleen spent the duration of her pregnancy miles away from family and friends, and when it was time to have her baby, she returned to Liverpool.  'After she had Jeffery, I think the pressure from her parents probably got on her every single day.  I think she fought it as hard as she could, she wasn't going to let him go. But she came home one day and the baby wasn't there, he was gone.'

Jayne added, 'It hurt mum to the depths of her soul to let him go. She carried it with her for the rest of her life.'

Kathleen sadly died at the age of 53, and one of the last things she spoke about was her long-lost son.  Before Jayne went to the Long Lost Family team, she had exhausted all search options and hit a dead end.  However, thankfully, the team discovered that Jeffrey was adopted by a couple who lived in the Lake District and that his name was changed to Andrew.  The show's team of specialist intermediaries found that he is now living in Bristol, and wrote to him to reveal that he has a younger sister who is desperate to find him.  Host Nicky Campbell travelled to Bristol to meet Andrew, who welcomed the news that his birth family was searching for him.  Discussing his life with his adoptive family, Andrew told Nicky, 'I had a great upbringing, a great childhood, I felt a part of that family, they made me feel like a part of it. That's why I never went looking, it was that loyalty.'

However, after hearing the news of Jayne's search, Andrew was visibly taken aback and agreed to meet his birth siblings.  Meanwhile, co-host Davina McCall went to visit Jayne to share the news that her elder brother had been found, who was ecstatic, and after seeing an image, marvelled over Andrew's physical similarities to her mother.  She said at the time, 'Oh wow, I can see mum. Oh, I can't believe I'm actually seeing him! And I never had a big brother. Oh, how amazing.'

Jayne shares the news with her two brothers, Stephen and Jamie, who are also over the moon at the prospect of meeting Andrew.  At the end of the episode, in an emotional scene, the siblings finally had the reunion that Jayne had hoped for.  'As soon as I walked into the room, I just knew instantly that he was a part of me. He was part of our family.'

Jayne told her brother about her family's past, and they bonded over their similarities.  Andrew said, 'It's just incredible, the connection is there, and the instant warmth. Let's get on and fit in what we've missed in the past 30 years.'

He added, 'They couldn't have made me feel more welcome if they tried. It was fantastic.'

Jayne concluded, 'I feel like I've answered mum's request, so I know she'll be looking down, and she'll be so happy.'

4
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-15066945/My-baby-died-birth-wasnt-allowed-hold-42-years-later-emailed-learned-horrific-truth.html#newcomment

My baby died at birth and I wasn't even allowed to hold him. Then, 42 years later, he emailed me out of the blue and I learned the horrific truth

By DIANE SHEEHAN

Published: 01:47, 5 September 2025 | Updated: 08:12, 5 September 2025

As I opened the email, I was transported back more than 40 years. Back to a stark hospital room and a cold stainless-steel trolley where I lay, naked, bleeding, terrified and alone.  Violent tremors shook my body as the trauma of that terrible day in September 1976 came flooding back. Shameful memories I’d been so careful to keep locked away were suddenly screaming for attention. I read the words on my phone again and again. This couldn’t be true, it just couldn’t.  A 42-year-old man called Simon had written to me out of the blue, to say he believed I could be his mother. He’d been adopted at birth and the dates and location certainly tallied; I had indeed had a baby that day, in secret, as a woefully naïve, unmarried 21-year-old.  But Simon couldn’t be my son, because my baby had died. The midwives had whisked it away, without even telling me if I’d had a boy or a girl, before returning to tell me, dispassionately, that the baby was dead.  There were no comforting words, no ‘sorry for your loss’. To everyone at the hospital, I was nothing short of a disgrace and my baby’s death just punishment for my terrible sin.  And so, for four decades, I’d not spoken a word about it: not to my family or friends not even to my husband and two children. I swallowed my grief and shame, but it never left me.  But could this stranger be telling the truth?

Had my baby survived?

With trembling fingers, I opened the photos Simon had included with his message.  There I saw one of his daughter: a small, smiling girl, with my exact dark blonde curls and hazel eyes. It honestly felt like I was looking at a picture of myself as a child.  In that moment, my whole world turned upside down. Forty-two years after leaving hospital with nothing but a broken heart and buried trauma, I was finally on my way to learning the shocking truth.  Like thousands of unmarried mothers across the world, I’d been a victim of a heinous scandal. Such was the shame of having a baby out of wedlock back then, that up until the late 1970s thousands of children were adopted against their mother’s wishes.  In my case, the authorities went one step further by lying to me that my baby had died, so I didn’t even get a chance to object.  Of course, no statistics exist citing how many poor young girls were victims of this particularly cruel crime. If, like me, they’d kept their pregnancy secret, possibly hundreds went to their graves never knowing their child had lived.  Although I count myself as one of the lucky ones as I eventually discovered the truth, at the age of 63, my fury was intense.  It was more than anger; it was a sense of total disempowerment. These strangers had taken control of my life, because they thought that they knew better, and treated me like rubbish to be swept away and forgotten.  I was born in 1955 to a strict Catholic family, the eldest of five children, and raised in Wellington, New Zealand.  We went to a religious school and church three times a week. Our ‘sex education’ if you can call it that consisted of quite frankly ridiculous ‘advice’ such as never to sit on a bus seat after a boy, as you could get pregnant.  When I left home at 19 to work in a pub in Sydney, Australia, mum had slipped me a booklet about anatomy under the bathroom door, but even then I had only the sketchiest ideas about biology and how babies were made.  From Sydney, I got an au pair job in Canada, where I lived an ideal life, riding horses on the family’s land. And it was here, aged 20, that I fell in love with Jason, a handsome man ten years my senior, who lived on a nearby farm.  Of course, when we began having sex, we didn’t use contraception. Utterly naïve, and hopelessly in love, it just didn’t occur to me.  When Jason got a job in California I went to visit him for a weekend but missed my flight home. When I returned, my employer was furious and sacked me on the spot. No job meant no visa, so I had to return to New Zealand.  I was devastated. By then Jason was travelling and, while I considered writing to his old farm in the hope they might be able to pass on a message, since they didn’t know about our relationship, I eventually decided not to.  A month later I got another job in Sydney, at a horse farm run by a Catholic doctor, Mark, and his wife, Alice. When I started feeling nauseous, I initially put it down to heartbreak. Yet I’d seen enough on the farm to understand what my swelling stomach signalled.  Denial and guilt are a powerful combination, however, so I hid in baggy dungarees and worked from sunrise to sunset, deliberately leaving myself too exhausted to think about the future.  My feelings of shame were so intense I didn’t consider telling anyone not my family, or even Jason. But there was only so long I could maintain my state of denial.  One night in September 1976, when I was 21, my contractions started. By morning, the pain was so intense, I staggered to the main house begging for help, saying I had dreadful stomach-ache.  Alice drove me to the local doctor. I heard him say, ‘oh my God’ as he removed my overalls, and I saw the shock and anger on Alice’s face when the truth hit her.

She refused to even go with me to the hospital.  The same attitude greeted me on the labour ward, where one glance at my ringless left hand told the medical staff everything they needed to know.  I’ve managed to block out most of the details of the birth: the agony, the terror and the strange silence that descended as my baby was bundled up and spirited away in a stranger’s arms.  I never heard him cry. I never even saw his face. I was left naked, bleeding, freezing and sobbing on the hospital trolley.  What happened next is still a horrible blur; I can’t remember the specific words used, but I know a woman returned to tell me my baby hadn’t survived.  At that moment, I shut down, without the strength to ask any questions, telling myself I deserved this.  The next thing I remember, some paperwork was thrust into my hand, and a cold voice told me I couldn’t leave until I’d signed the discharge papers. Like a robot I did what I was told.  I was in turmoil, and without anyone to comfort me. Nobody knew about my pregnancy except Alice and Mark, and their house was the only place I had to go.  I can’t recall how I got there, I just remember walking into the house and no one uttered a word. They didn’t ask about the baby, or what had happened nothing.  It was such a dark time. But how could I grieve a child I’d tried so hard to pretend I’d never carried?

I did the only thing I could think of; I put it all Jason, the pregnancy, the baby in a mental box and slammed it shut.  Later that year, when a visiting vet offered me a job elsewhere in Sydney, I left Alice and Mark’s house without saying goodbye.  A new Diane had replaced the naïve, trusting girl who’d first left home at 19 a young woman hardened to the world and determined never to be made to feel so powerless again.  I ploughed all my energy into work, going on to study veterinary science at university and qualifying as a vet.  In 1983, I met Ian, another student. He was my first sexual partner since Jason but, having now abandoned my faith, our relationship felt fun and exciting free from the guilt I’d previously felt.  We went on to marry in 1987, yet I never came close to sharing my terrible secret with him; while he might have been supportive, I didn’t want to risk ruining my fresh start by opening Pandora’s box.  In 1991, our daughter Sarah was born. The pregnancy was a world away from my first one; now, everyone was so happy for me, and I felt loved and respected.  As for the birth itself, it was night and day compared with my previous labour.  And yet, after Sarah was taken to be weighed and measured, I didn’t automatically hold out my arms to get her back. I was frozen. The nurse had to gently ask, ‘Do you want to hold your baby?’

When I did, the wave of love I felt was incredible. Cradling my beautiful daughter in my arms, it hit me: this one I get to keep.  I promised her I wouldn’t let a day go by without me telling her how much I loved her.  I adored motherhood, and at times watching Sarah I’d find myself thinking ‘What if ....?’

Yet I’d quickly push those thoughts away.  When our son Daniel was born two years later, I felt the same fierce love of a woman who knows what it’s like to not bring a baby home. Somehow, 25 years passed. The children grew into happy, healthy adults and, although my marriage didn’t last, I was living a good life, filled with love.  Then one evening in December 2018, I’d been out for dinner with Daniel and on my return noticed an email on my phone from an unknown address.  It was long, and at first only certain phrases jumped out at me. That Simon, the writer, had been adopted at birth, from the same hospital I’d attended, and had recently taken a DNA test, which had led him, via a long, convoluted path, to me.  He’d found a picture of me online and had immediately recognised a similarity to his own daughter, then three.  While some people might have thought it was a mistake, or a scam, when I saw the picture of Simon himself, I was left in no doubt. He was the image of Jason. I knew, just knew, that this 42-year-old man was my first-born child, and that the hospital authorities had lied to me.  Those ‘discharge’ papers at the hospital?

They must have been adoption papers. The cruelty took my breath away.  I had no idea where to turn to or what to do.  Frantically googling for answers, I found The Benevolent Society, which supports people affected by adoption.  The very next day, I found myself sitting in their office with a counsellor.  For the first time in 42 years, I talked about my past. Everything I’d bottled up for decades, all the pain, fear, guilt and shame, came pouring out as well as my new-found anger.  The counsellor told me there had been thousands of forced adoptions in Australia in the past and, shockingly, telling unmarried mothers their babies had died wasn’t uncommon.  With her help I was able to sit down and write a reply to Simon a few days later.  ‘There’s no easy way to say this,’ I wrote. ‘But when you were born, I was told you’d died.’

I tried to explain the impact that losing him had on my life, and told him about Sarah and Daniel, his half-sister and brother.  Without my counsellor I’d never have made it through; my emotions were in free-fall. I was grappling with exhaustion and guilt at hiding this bombshell from Sarah and Daniel, as well as the awful fear that when they did discover it, they’d judge me.  I knew I’d have to tell them at some point, but I needed to meet Simon first, to get my facts straight.  In follow-up emails, Simon explained he’d been adopted at birth by a lovely couple who adored him. Though he always knew he was adopted, he’d had a wonderful childhood.  After becoming a father himself he decided he wanted to find his birth parents, and he’d registered his DNA on an ancestry website, which led him to Jason’s family in Canada.  Jason had recently died, but a relative remembered him mentioning his old girlfriend Diane in Australia, and he’d managed to trace me. When he did, he realised his ancestry results had linked him to some of my relatives too.  Of course, Simon was devastated to learn about the terrible circumstances of his birth. Like me, the sheer cruelty of it astounded him.  His adoptive parents had been kept in the dark too; they’d been told I had chosen to give Simon up but wanted him to be raised by a Catholic family, and for years they’d even sent me letters and photos showing his progress to an address they’d been given. Who knows where they ended up.  The next month I flew two hours from my home in Brisbane to meet Simon.  I was almost hyperventilating with fear. Would blood be enough to bring us together, or would Simon decide he didn’t want me in his life after all?

And what would all this mean for Sarah and Daniel?

Then suddenly I was walking through arrivals and saw him, holding a bunch of white flowers. All my fears flew away, and I fell sobbing into his arms the first time I’d ever held him. He didn’t feel like a stranger at all.  Our conversation about his family and mine was warm and easy.  I couldn’t stop staring at him, unable to believe I could reach across the table and touch him. It felt impossible, yet wonderful.  It was hard to say goodbye the next day, but there was one huge hurdle I needed to clear: I had to tell Sarah and Daniel my secret.  Two days later, I invited them over for a dinner, shaking with nerves as we sat down.  Hearing my shocking story, they were incredible; hurt and horrified for me, yet excited to meet their new half-brother.  My relief was indescribable; I fell asleep with a smile on my face for the first time in decades. It was only after it lifted that I realised the true weight of what I’d been carrying all these years.  A few weeks later, we were all sitting in a busy restaurant in Brisbane, sharing food and laughing. Looking around at my three children was overwhelming, and I felt a sense of peace that had once seemed impossible.  There were still more emotional moments to come, like telling my siblings and seeing their shock and sadness, though they were all supportive. My parents had died years before.  In 2019, a year after Simon’s email, I met his adoptive parents. Though what happened at his birth is so sad, I’m glad he found such a loving family.  I investigated pursuing the matter with the hospital where I’d given birth, but was told the buildings had been demolished and the records destroyed.  I decided not to pour my energy into a fight I probably wouldn’t win, and I refused to let bitterness consume me. Instead, I chose peace, to live for now and spend the time I do have with my incredible family.  It isn’t always easy. The anguish of those lost years, and the love I could have given Simon, is a wound that will never heal.  Still, our relationship is wonderful, comfortable and peaceful. We see each other every month and talk or text three times a week.  I’m so proud of the kind, caring person, and amazing father, he is and the incredible bond we have built against all odds.

*  Names have been changed

*  As told to Kate Graham

5
Articles / 'Charity help changed everything for our daughter'
« on: August 16, 2025, 08:35:27 PM »
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0e9q9rr488o

'Charity help changed everything for our daughter'
Alexandra Bassingham BBC News, West of England Kelly Withers BBC News, Somerset

A couple said the support they received from a charity helping children with neurological and developmental difficulties "changed everything" for their daughter.  Luke, 40, and Alex, 42, from West Sussex, said they were struggling to know how to help their adopted daughter Octavia, eight, when they noticed she had early life developmental delay.  They approached the charity Bibic, in Langport, Somerset, in November 2022, who "instantly got it", they said, creating a sound therapy programme that helped Octavia with her anxiety and hypervigilance.  "We just can't get our heads around the difference it has made to us as a family," Luke said.

"At the start, we didn't know whether her behaviour was trauma, birth or neuro related," Luke said.

He said Bibic staff were "very available from our first phone call to them".  "Then when we got to assessment they spent two whole days with us which is unheard of," he said.

The couple, who also have another adopted daughter, said the charity gave them all the information they and her school needed.  This was done without Octavia "being labelled or put on medication", Luke said.

Fight or flight

She was given a sound therapy programme involving bespoke music, called Johansen Individualised Auditory Stimulation.  It helps children who may have had problems processing speech and sounds.  Luke said Octavia had been living in fight or flight mode due to early trauma but 10 months after the start of her treatment, she was no longer in a constant state of hypervigilance and anxiety.  He said she went from being unable to fit into a school environment to going into Year 2 "like nothing had happened".

Bibic has just launched a campaign to raise £25,000 in a month to fill a funding gap, following unsuccessful grant applications.  Gemma Pack, senior fundraising officer, said: "We receive no government or statutory funding at all so everything we need to run the charity we have to find ourselves and that's really difficult in a post-Covid world."

She said following the pandemic, the charity's waiting list soared to 68 weeks and after expanding their team to meet demand, it is now down to 10 weeks.  However, the waiting list is now threatened again by the funding shortfall, she said.

6
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14959693/Adopting-son-left-depressed-stop-crying-thought-Id-seen-failed-mum-realised-truth-battle-JODIE-BRAIN.html#newcomment

Adopting my son left me depressed I couldn't stop crying. I thought I'd be seen as a failed mum then I realised truth behind my battle: JODIE BRAIN

By JODIE BRAIN

Published: 01:44, 1 August 2025 | Updated: 10:33, 1 August 2025

And I should have been happy this is all I'd wanted, for so long. For ten, long, painful years of infertility I'd dreamed and prayed for this moment, when I'd finally be a mother.  But now little Charlie was here I just felt empty.  It's a sadly not uncommon lament from a first-time mother. Post-natal depression is a well-documented and cruel affliction, affecting one in ten women in the year after they give birth, and caused by multiple factors, including fluctuating hormones, anxiety and lack of sleep.  But I hadn't given birth. We'd adopted Charlie five months earlier, when he was ten months old. Yet all the symptoms of post-natal depression were there.  Even my GP was confounded; he asked me what I wanted him to do to help me. If he didn't know, I certainly didn't. I just wanted someone to tell me what was wrong.  Eventually, I was diagnosed with post-adoption depression, or PAD, by my GP. It is a condition so rarely spoken about even medical professionals seemed unsure how to handle it.  Yet it is real different from post-natal depression, but just as valid and as painful.  My husband Darrell, now 38, and I had married in 2008 and started trying for a baby straight away. Every month that passed without a positive test was another blow. At first, we were hopeful; after all we were young and healthy.  After 12 months, we went to the doctor, who kept telling us to be patient, that it would happen.  But it didn't. We tracked my cycle, spent a fortune on ovulation and pregnancy tests every month and timed everything perfectly, but nothing worked.  Every month, I cried when my period came, and Darrell would hug me. It just seemed so unfair; we ran out of ways to reassure each other.  We didn't tell anyone we were struggling until my sister announced she was pregnant in 2016. That day, the floodgates opened and I broke down in tears to my mum. She had no idea what we had been going through. With no small children in the family, the topic had never come up.  At the time, I worked in a baby room within a nursery. Every day I was looking after other people's babies, cuddling them, caring for them then handing them back. It was heartbreaking, so much so that I quit my job and went to work in M&S.  Finally, at the beginning of 2018, when I was 29, we made our first visit to a fertility clinic, where doctors confirmed there was zero chance we would ever conceive naturally and IVF was our only option. But, even then, there was no guarantee.  It was painful to hear that my body couldn't do what a woman's body was 'meant' to do, and that we had wasted so much time and money pursuing something that was never going to happen. Yet knowing also gave us clarity at least we could now work out the next steps.  Because of the postcode lottery in the Cotswolds where we live, we would only get one free try of IVF on the NHS after that we'd have to pay privately.  With a single round costing anywhere from £4,000, that simply wasn't an option for us; I was working in retail and Darrell as a warehouse manager, and we certainly didn't have a huge pot of savings to dip into. If we paid for the IVF, we would have been left with no money to raise a child. Plus, I didn't want to put my body through something that might not work.  That's when I realised being a mother doesn't necessarily mean you have to be pregnant.  As we drove home from the fertility clinic, I turned to Darrell and said: 'Let's look into adoption then.'

We had never mentioned it before, but now it was the obvious choice. We just really wanted to be parents and build our own family whatever form that took.  When we started researching, we decided we didn't want to foster-to-adopt – where you foster a young baby, in the hope you can later adopt them a process that leaves a chance that the child could be handed back to their birth parents if circumstances change. I knew that after so long trying for a baby, it would kill me if that were to happen.  So we decided to try to adopt a child under the age of three, never dreaming we would get a baby.  The adoption process was intense. We had to share everything our relationship history, finances, even our childhood experiences. We were assigned a social worker and went through hours of preparation training, psychological evaluations and home checks.  It took a full year to be approved as adopters. Then came another year of waiting during the matching process. It was a bit surreal almost like a dating site. There's a database where each child has a profile including a photo, personality traits and health notes. As prospective parents, we had our own profiles, too, listing our jobs, home and lifestyle.  At first, we avoided looking at photos. We wanted to choose based on compatibility, not appearances. But then I saw a photo of a little boy around three months old. He had the most adorable smile with dimples on both cheeks and my heart stopped. 'That's our boy,' I told my husband I just knew.

Funnily enough, the family finder had already bookmarked us as a potential match for him. It felt like fate.  We expressed interest in March 2020. Then the pandemic hit, and lockdown delayed everything. We couldn't even meet him in person until that September. In the meantime, we sent him a photo book of us and our home, and a cuddly fox toy that we hoped he would bond with.  When we finally met him at his foster carers' home, Charlie was nine months old. He was asleep in the front room when we got there, and we peeked through the glass door and saw him in his chair.  When he woke, one of the carers brought him in and put him on the floor to play. She wanted him to make his way to us when he was ready and, to my delight, he crawled straight over to us.  I had been so worried that after years of working as a nursery nurse I'd feel detached, but the feeling was like nothing I'd ever experienced before.  He wasn't just another baby; he felt like ours.  We stayed nearby for nine days, gradually increasing our time with him. After that, his foster carers brought him to stay in a hotel near us, and he visited each day to get used to our home.  On the day after he moved in, he turned ten months old. It was October 2020, and he was officially our son. I felt like I was on cloud nine, finally a mum after so many years of hoping and dreaming.  We'd had his bedroom prepared for months, and that first night Darrell and I had planned to take it in turns to see to Charlie when he woke up. Every time he cried, however, we were both up and ready to settle him together. No one got much sleep that night, but we were so happy.  With experience working with children, I knew I'd manage the practical side the bottles and nappies but I was nervous about how love would develop.  In the end, it came easily. We bonded quickly and it felt like he'd always been part of our lives.  Still, our transition into parenthood was abrupt. We'd spent ten years preparing in our minds but, in reality, we had just two-and-a-half weeks between being officially matched and having a baby in our home.  At first, I was too busy to notice how I felt. I had nine months' maternity leave to learn his routines, likes and dislikes, and adapt to the seismic shift in my life and identity.  Five months in, however, around the time the adoption was finalised in March 2021, making Charlie legally ours, cracks began to show.  I started crying regularly. I felt confused and flat, and I couldn't relate to the other mums at baby groups. While they talked about breastfeeding and labour stories, I had nothing to add. I felt like an outsider.  It wasn't that I was treated differently, but the conversations would invariably go towards why Charlie was adopted, and what had happened with his birth mother, who had been unable to care for him, though I never shared any details with them it wasn't my story to share.  I was also careful not to reveal we'd been trying to have a baby for ten years, as I definitely didn't want people feeling sorry for me.  By the time my son was 17 months old, I was due to return to work – and that's when the depression really took hold. I didn't want to leave him. I'd waited so long to be a mum and now I was supposed to hand him over to Darrell, while I worked evening shifts.  Darrell was a hands-on dad, and was brilliant with Charlie, so I couldn't work out why I was so worried about leaving him.  Part of my depression manifested as obsession. I had to do everything myself every feed, bath and bedtime. I felt like I had a duty to do it, because I was now Charlie's mum. Darrell was always happy to take on the routine, but I just found it so hard to let go.  It got to the point where I was crying all the time and didn't want to go out. I stopped attending mum and baby groups altogether.  No one around me seemed to understand. Friends sympathised with the challenges of sleepless nights and toddler tantrums, but not with the intensity and emotional roller-coaster of the adoption process. How could they?

They'd never been through it.  By this point, we had little to no contact with social workers, as the adoption order had been granted. But in the back of my mind there was always the thought that if I reached out to them, they might see me as a failure of a mother. Looking back, I realise that was a ridiculous thought, but in the moment that's how I truly felt.  That's when I eventually called my GP in tears. Because of Covid, I couldn't visit in person, so I sobbed down the phone.  After asking me what I wanted them to do, they offered talking therapy, which I tried. But it was geared towards post-natal depression based on hormonal shifts, traumatic births or breastfeeding struggles.  I needed someone to acknowledge that I had just become a mother through adoption and that it came with its own set of emotional challenges.  So, on the GP's recommendation, I started taking antidepressants, which saved me from going to a darker place.  I also found online groups for adoptive parents and, finally, I felt understood.  Other mums shared their own experiences of PAD, and suddenly my feelings didn't seem so strange.  I was lucky to have such a supportive husband in Darrell. After a decade trying for a baby, a lengthy adoption process, plus PAD, I knew it could have been very different but thankfully it was the making of our marriage.  Slowly, things began to shift. The antidepressants helped while I got my home and work-life balance in order, but then I started to feel numb. I'd gone from crying all the time to feeling nothing. I didn't even shed a tear when watching an emotional film.  Darrell tried to support me the best he could as much as I let him in and I know he was desperately worried about me.  So, after taking the medication for two months, and with advice from my GP, I weaned myself off the antidepressants.  After six long months, I learned to give myself a break and finally enjoy being in the moment with my boy, rather than worrying and obsessing about what I was missing when I wasn't there.  I was Charlie's mum and as good and as fallible as any other mother, whatever path I'd taken to build my family.  Now, our son is five-and-a-half. He knows he's adopted, and is happy to talk about it. He tells people 'Mummy and Daddy chose me,' which I love.

We have letterbox contact with his biological parents once a year and will continue for as long as he's happy to do so.  We currently have no plans to have face-to-face contact, but if that's something he wants to do when he's an adult, we're open to having that conversation then.  I love that he's proud of his story, and I now speak openly about the adoption process and the joys it's brought us.  It's not always considered by couples struggling to conceive, but it's been the best decision we ever made.  I'm also open about post-adoption depression, how it's perfectly OK not to be OK, especially in those vulnerable first months. I just wish there was more awareness and support for adoptive parents like us.  There is some support available, but it's not always well-funded, and only this year we saw services cut back and financial support reduced.  My biggest piece of advice to adoptive parents is to find your tribe. I've joined various support groups for adoptive parents, and we chat online and share advice.  I've taken part in adoption events, offered advice and spoken about my experiences on social media.  I've made some wonderful friends, one of whom's child came from the same foster carers as Charlie. We are so similar, and it feels so good to have her in my corner whenever I need her.  We may not have pregnancy or birth stories to share, but we have our own unique experiences both lows and highs and just as much love for our children as other parents.  Most importantly, I no longer feel guilty for struggling. I went through something huge and now realise I'm only human.  I've become a stronger, more resilient mother and I love my child just as much as mums love their biological children. Post-adoption depression is nothing to be ashamed of.

As told to Julia Sidwell

7
Articles / Woman smuggled baby into UK using fake birth story
« on: July 24, 2025, 07:12:15 PM »
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98jl8jnz92o

Woman smuggled baby into UK using fake birth story
14 July 2025
Sanchia Berg News correspondent, Tara Mewawalla, BBC News

Last summer, a woman was arrested at Gatwick Airport after she arrived from Nigeria with a very young baby girl.  The woman had been living in West Yorkshire with her husband and children, and before leaving the UK for Africa had told her GP she was pregnant.  That was not true.  When the woman returned about a month later with the baby, she was arrested on suspicion of trafficking.  The case, the second the BBC has followed through the Family Court in recent months, reveals what experts say is a worrying trend of babies possibly being brought to the UK unlawfully some from so-called "baby factories" in Nigeria.

'My babies are always hidden'

The woman, who we are calling Susan, is Nigerian, but had been living in England since June 2023, with her husband and children.  A careworker with leave to remain in Britain, Susan claimed she was pregnant. But scans and blood tests showed that wasn't true. Instead, they revealed Susan had a tumour, which doctors feared could be cancerous. But she refused treatment.  Susan insisted her previous pregnancies had been invisible on scans, telling her employer, "my babies are always hidden".

She also claimed she'd been pregnant for up to 30 months with her other children.  Susan had travelled to Nigeria in early June 2024, saying she wanted to have her baby there, and then contacted her local hospital in Britain, to say she had given birth.  Doctors were concerned and contacted children's services.  Arriving back in the UK with the baby girl who we're calling Eleanor Susan was stopped and arrested by Sussex Police.  She was bailed and the lead police force on this confirmed there is no active investigation at the moment.  After her arrest, Susan, her husband, and Eleanor were given DNA tests. Eleanor was taken to foster carers.  "When the results show that I am Eleanor's mother, I want her to be returned immediately," Susan said.

But the tests showed the baby had no genetic link with Susan or her husband. Susan demanded a second test which gave the same result, and then she changed her story.  She'd had IVF treatment before moving to Britain in 2023 with a donor egg and sperm, she said, and that's why the DNA tests were negative.  Susan provided a letter from a Nigerian hospital, signed by the medical director, saying she'd given birth there, as well as a document from another clinic about the IVF treatment to back up her claims.  She also provided photos and videos which she said showed her in the Nigerian hospital's labour suite. No face is visible in the images and one showed a naked woman with a placenta between her legs, with an umbilical cord still attached to it.

Someone had given birth it wasn't Susan

The Family Court in Leeds sent Henrietta Coker to investigate.  Ms Coker, who provides expert reports to family courts in cases like this, has nearly 30 years experience as a social worker. She trained in Britain, and worked in front-line child protection in London, before moving to Africa.  Ms Coker visited the medical centre where Susan claimed she'd had IVF. There was no record of Susan having had treatment there staff told her the letter was forged.  She then visited the place Susan said she'd given birth. It was a shabby, three bedroom flat, with "stained" walls and "dirty" carpets.  There Ms Coker was met by "three young teenage girls sitting in the reception room with nurses' uniforms on".

She asked to speak to the matron and was "ushered into the kitchen where a teenage girl was eating rice".

Ms Coker then tracked down the doctor who'd written a letter saying Susan had given birth there. He said, "Yes, someone had given birth".

Ms Coker showed him a photograph of Susan, but it wasn't her, the doctor said.  "Impersonating people is common in this part of the world," he told Ms Coker, suggesting that Susan might have "bought the baby".

The practice of "baby farming" is well known in West Africa, Ms Coker later told the court. At least 200 illegal "baby factories" have been shut down by the Nigerian authorities in the last five years, she said.  Some contained young girls who'd been kidnapped, raped, and forced to give birth repeatedly.  "Sometimes these girls are released," Ms Coker said, "other times they die during childbirth, or are murdered and placed in the grounds of the organisation."

It's not clear where baby Eleanor might have come from though the doctor told Ms Coker he believed she would have been given up voluntarily.  Ms Coker was unable to establish who Eleanor's real parents are.  She gave evidence to the Family Court in Leeds in March this year, along with Susan, her husband, her employer and a senior obstetrician.  At an earlier hearing the judge asked for Susan's phone to be examined. Investigators found messages which Susan had sent to someone saved in her address book as "Mum oft [sic] Lagos Baby".

About four weeks before the alleged date of birth Susan wrote a text message which read:  "Good afternoon ma, I have not seen the hospital items"

The same day, Mum Oft Lagos Baby responded:  "Delivery drug is 3.4 m

"Hospital bill 170k."

Assuming those sums to be Nigerian Naira, they would be in the region of £1,700 and £85 respectively, the Family Court judge, Recorder William Tyler KC said.  The local authority pointed out the messages were set to "automatic self-destruct mode" and said they represented evidence of a deal to purchase a baby.  Susan tried to explain the messages in court. The Recorder said her attempts were "difficult to follow and impossible to accept".

Recorder Tyler, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court, found Susan had "staged a scene" which she falsely claimed showed her giving birth to Eleanor in Nigeria.  He said Susan and her husband had put forward a "fundamental lie" to explain how Eleanor came to be in their care, and had tried to mislead authorities with false documents.  They'd both caused the little girl "significant emotional and psychological harm", he said.

In early July, the BBC attended the final hearing in Eleanor's case, held remotely.  In one little square of the Teams meeting we could see Susan and her husband, sitting upright, barely moving, focused closely on what the advocates said.  They wanted Eleanor returned to them. Their barristers said their own children were thriving they wanted to offer her the same love and care.  Susan's husband saw Eleanor as "a fundamental part of their family unit".

Vikki Horspool, representing the child's guardian, a social worker from the Independent Children and Family Child Advisory Service challenged that. She said that the couple "continued to be dishonest" about Eleanor's real start in life and how she came to be in their care. 
The judge ordered that baby Eleanor be placed for adoption, and also made a "declaration of non parentage". He said he was aware of the "pain" this would cause Susan and her husband.  The barrister for the local authority told the court that the baby is "very settled" with her foster carer, taking part in activities in her community and getting medical treatment.  When Eleanor is adopted she will have a new identity and British nationality but she may never know who her real parents are.  Eleanor's story echoes the case of "Lucy" who was brought into Manchester Airport in 2023, by a man claiming to be her father.  'Money exchanged for children'  Ms Coker believes it is likely that more children have been brought unlawfully to the UK from West Africa. She told the BBC she has worked on around a dozen similar cases since the pandemic. In her experience, baby trafficking is commonplace.  "Money is getting exchanged for children on a large scale" she said - not just in Africa but "across the global south".

Since 2021 the UK government has restricted adoptions from Nigeria, partly because of "evidence of organised child trafficking" within the country.  British authorities have been aware of the problem for many years, and there have been several cases in the Family Courts over the last 20 years.  Two hearings in 2011 and 2012 involved Nigerian couples who'd had "fertility treatment " that led to a "miracle baby".

These "treatments" continue, as recently exposed by investigative journalists at BBC Africa Eye.  In 2013, the UK High Commission in Lagos required DNA tests in certain circumstances before newborn babies could be taken from Nigeria to Britain.  Among 12 couples investigated was a former Oxford academic, prosecuted for immigration offences.  However this process has since stopped. In 2018 officials were advised that such DNA testing was unlawful.  They were told they could not make people undergo DNA testing when they were asking for a visa or passport in support of an application relating to immigration status and that had been the case since 2014.  Ms Coker said some clinics offer "packages" that include registering the baby's birth. It will cost anywhere between £2,000 and £8,000, excluding any airfare, she said.  She thinks more people in Britain should be aware of this activity.  It is hard to tackle, she said - perhaps DNA testing of newborn babies and purported parents would help.  But she wasn't sure the British government can do much to stop it, she said, "the issues start in countries where the children are born".

Patricia Durr, CEO of the anti-trafficking charity ECPAT said cases like this were particularly "heinous" because they denied a child right to their identity.  She said: "Every effort must be made to prevent these egregious crimes occurring."

A government spokesperson said: "Falsely claiming to be the parent of a child to facilitate entry to the UK is illegal. Those found doing so will face the full force of the law.  "Border Force is committed to protecting individuals who cross the border and where concerns are raised, officers will take action to safeguard individuals who could be at risk."

The BBC contacted the Nigerian High Commission for comment but they did not respond.

If you've been affected by issues raised in this story, there is information and support available on BBC Action Line.

8
Articles / 'Just say sorry', say forcibly adopted women
« on: July 20, 2025, 05:54:01 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czdvg3y1jgeo

'Just say sorry', say forcibly adopted women

Fiona Irving & Jody Sabral BBC News, South East
Cash Murphy BBC News, South East

Published 14 July 2025

Two Kent women who were removed from their mothers when they were just weeks old and forcibly adopted say they need the government to formally apologise in order to help them recover from the trauma.  "Why can't they just say sorry? They haven't got the guts," said Helen Weston from Yalding who was taken from her 15-year-old mother when she was 12 days old.

Nikki Paine, from Ashford, who was adopted at six weeks old, and was diagnosed with PTSD, says she just wants an acknowledgement of what happened to her.  A demonstration is due to take place on Wednesday to urge the government to apologise to the hundreds of people forcibly adopted during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s as well as their mothers.  An inquiry by the human rights select committee, undertaken in 2021, looked at the experiences of children adopted across this period because their parents were either underage or not married.  Published in July 2022, its report recommended a formal apology after finding that babies were taken from mothers who did not want to let them go.  The Welsh and Scottish governments have officially apologised to those affected by forced adoptions, but the UK government so far has not.

'Wracked with guilt'

Ms Weston said: "If we get the validation then maybe my birth mother won't be so wracked with guilt and shame and keeping this dreadful secret."

She was adopted in 1967 after her teenage mother was forced to give her up.  She says it has had a profound impact on her life and was diagnosed with complex PTSD.  "I'm not angry with anybody, I think that's why I get so depressed," she said.

"If there was one person I could be angry at, if one person was responsible, then I could give them a gob full and get rid of it.  They genuinely thought they were doing the best for us."

Ms Paine, who has also been diagnosed with complex PTSD, will be among those demonstrating in Westminster on Monday.  She said: "We're all suffering from anxiety, we're all on antidepressants.  The apology would get the mental health support and that's really important." 

She said: "We want this to be recognised because they took me away from my mother.  I'm 63-years-old and it's still affecting my life."

'I wanted my real mum'

Wednesday's protest has been organised by adoptee advocate Zara Phillips, and is supported by the Movement for an Adoption Apology.  According to the group, between 1945 and 1976 an estimated 215,000 women had their children taken away from them.  A spokesperson for the group said: "We are all growing older and time is running out.  We have been ignored by successive governments and now urgently need a public apology for this very personal and painful lifelong trauma."

They said: "A public apology would help mothers and adoptees change the narrative around what was done to them.  It would acknowledge the injustice and the loss which will endure for the rest of their lives."

Some adoptees say they feel like they do not belong in their adoptive families especially when their adoptive parents have their own birth children.  Ms Weston said: "I was adopted into a family who had two children of their own, the dynamic with my adopted family was that I was always a problem child," said Mrs Weston.

Ms Paine echoed this sentiment, saying: "I told my mother that she never hugged me, but she said you never wanted me to, and I thought how can you say that, but of course I wanted my real mum."

The Department for Education has been approached for a comment.

9
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14891365/Melissa-Gilbert-biological-father-Little-House-Prairie.html?login&signinStatus=authenticated&signinMethod=password&dataCaptured=false&flowVariant=standard_signin_nosubscribe&param_code=k7pe13qbsjn75b4iqjln&param_state=eyJyZW1lbWJlck1lIjp0cnVlLCJyZWdTb3VyY2UiOiJtd2ViX2NvbW1lbnQiLCJyYW5kb21TdGF0ZSI6ImUyY2JkNzc5LTk0M2YtNDFmNi05NzJmLTE4NWVlYTVjYThjZCJ9&param_info=%7B%22signinStatus%22%3A%22authenticated%22%2C%22signinMethod%22%3A%22password%22%2C%22dataCaptured%22%3Afalse%2C%22flowVariant%22%3A%22standard_signin_nosubscribe%22%7D&param__host=www.dailymail.co.uk&param_geolocation=gb&base_fe_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2F&validation_fe_uri=%2Fregistration%2Fp%2Fapi%2Ffield%2Fvalidation%2F&check_user_fe_uri=registration%2Fp%2Fapi%2Fuser%2Fuser_check%2F&isMobile=false#newcomment

Adopted at birth Melissa Gilbert reveals astonishing moment she reconnected with biological father

    Have YOU got a story? Email tips@dailymail.com

By SONIA HORON FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Published: 03:02, 10 July 2025 | Updated: 08:01, 10 July 2025

Little House on the Prairie star Melissa Gilbert revealed how her biological father 'knew' she was his daughter from watching her onscreen.  The actress, 61, who was adopted after birth, discussed the journey of finding her biological parents on an episode of Patrick Labyorteaux's podcast on Tuesday.  As an adult, she found her birth father who was a stock car racer and musician and called him to share the news, only to find he already knew.  'I didn't tell him who I was, and then he asked me, "Well, who are you? What do you do?"'

Gilbert, who was raised by her adoptive parents, actors Barbara Cowan and the late Paul Gilbert, said.  'And I said, "Well, here's the thing." And I said, "Did you ever watch Little House on the Prairie?" And he said, '"You're Laura, aren't you? I knew it." He knew it,' she added.

'He could see,' she said of her character on the show, Laura Ingalls. 'And when I met my half siblings, we all look alike. So, you could definitely see it. So, it's pretty clear.'

Gilbert also discussed her birth mother Kathy, who passed away before she got to reconnect with her, sharing that she was a former exotic dancer.   Given her biological parents' background in entertainment, and her adoptive parents' acting backgrounds, Gilbert noted, 'It was pretty clear that it was in me.'

When she began 'searching' for her birth parents, Gilbert learned about their past.  'They were each married to other people and had three children each and ran off together and conceived me on a motorcycle trip in the desert,' she revealed.  Explains a lot. And then they left their spouses for each other and got married after [getting] pregnant with me and moved all the kids in, so I was number seven. So the decision was made to put me up for adoption.'

Gilbert also spoke about her two kids: Dakota, whom she shares with her first husband, director Bo Brinkman, and another son, Michael, born in 1995, whom she shares with her second husband, actor Bruce Boxleitner.  She noted how they also shared her physical features: 'When I saw [son Dakota] for the first time, I went, "Oh my god,"' Gilbert said of her first child, who was born in 1989.

'He had my eyebrows and he had my lips, and I'd never seen anyone that looked like me. And then I realized there's got to be more.'

Last year she paid tribute to her both her adoptive mom Barbara and biological mom Kathy in a touching Mother's Day post.  She shared a snap of herself with Barbara, as well as another photo of her birth mom holding a rifle.  'Happiest of Mothers Days to these two. The one with the rifle? I grew under her heart. The one beside me? I grew IN her heart.'

'This is my birth mother Kathy, who had the courage to love me enough to let me go. The stunning blonde is my mama @barbaragilbertcowan .She is just a magic person. And lucky me, I get to spend today with her.'

'Sending all mothers, stepmothers, God mothers, birth mothers, surrogate mothers, adoptive mothers and anyone who steps in to be a mother to a child who doesn’t have one. I honor you all today,' she wrote.

In 2022, Melissa opened up about losing her adoptive father Paul to suicide when she was a child, saying she didn't learn he had killed himself until she was 45.  She called him 'the most incredibly talented, vivacious, funny, loving, fair person I ever knew.'

Gilbert was adopted by Paul and his wife, actress Barbara, one day after her birth. The couple had been divorced for three years when he died in February 1976.  Like many people at the time, she and her adopted brother, Jonathan Gilbert, were told he died of a stroke in his sleep.  'I didn't know my father had died by suicide for a very, very long time,' she explained. 'I didn't find out till I was 45.'

Gilbert revealed her family's secret in her autobiography, Prairie Tale: A Memoir, which was published in 2009.  Melissa portrayed Laura, aka 'Half Pint', on the popular TV show Little House On The Prairie from 1974 until 1983, appearing in over 200 episodes.  Little House On The Prairie premiered with a pilot movie in March 1974 and celebrated its 50th anniversary last year.  She then continued to work throughout the 1980s and 1990s.  But eventually had to leave Los Angeles because of the 'pressures' she had faced over the years.  'All of the pressures, I faced all of them. When you live in Los Angeles, it's like living at the mall when you work at the mall,' she told People.

'Literally, everyone is in the business. When you walk into a restaurant, every head turns to see who walked in.  Everybody's always looking, curious, competing and that's a really difficult thing, especially for a female actor.'

10
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tv/article-14860477/baby-pink-abandoned-car-park-morning.html

I was abandoned by my mum in a car park 24 years ago now I've tracked down my dad and have a message for her I hope she never forgets

By ALEX DOYLE

Published: 12:53, 30 June 2025 | Updated: 14:18, 30 June 2025

A woman abandoned by her birth mother has returned to This Morning today 24 years after her first appearance on the show.  Sarah Meyer was left in a multistory carpark in 2001 and appeared on the ITV show's sofa as a newborn in a bid for police to trace her parents.  At the time, she had been dubbed the 'Baby In Pink' after being found in the Surrey location, wrapped in a pink towel.  More than two decades later, she returned to This Morning to give hosts Cat Deeley and Ben Shephard a major life update.  She told the pair how she was adopted after her appearance as footage showed her being doted on by then-hosts Judy Finnegan and Richard Madeley.  In the clip, Judy, now 77, held Sarah and told viewers: 'This little sprog was abandoned in a multi-story carpark. She was barely an hour old, weighing just 7lbs.'

After watching the tape back, Sarah said: 'It was crazy seeing that again and being back here. It's insane, full circle. I've been able to find my birth parents.  My foster parents have always kept me informed about my past, done it the right way. My backstory they've shown me the clips and newspaper. I've always had my identity and history, that's the way it should be. Any questions I've had, they answered.'

Sarah's search for her birth parents will be documented on Long Lost Family: Born Without A Trace this week.  She continued: 'I'm proud of my story. I wanted to find out what is out there but also wanted to show who is out there that I've had a good life.  I understand they'd also have the question of where am I now I wanted to show them that I'm okay and give them that reassurance. I'm at peace with it and they can put it to bed.  My birth mother thanked everyone for looking after me in a letter. The amount of gratitude of the people who stepped up to be my family is immense, they don't get enough gratitude. Nobody thanks them.  They are the start of the family for those people, Wendy was the start of my family.'

Wendy a police officer originally appeared on This Morning with Sarah in 2001.   Describing her birth father, Sarah told Cat and Ben: 'The fact that me and my dad are so alike is insane my dad didn't even know that I existed. The way he welcomed me into his family was insane. My nan worked in the hospital I was brought into.'

Addressing her birth mother's absence, she said: 'The door is open for my birth mother and always will be. I've had 24 years to process my story. My mum has had a much shorter amount of time to process it. Life is complex.'

Ben and Cat then played a sweet video message from Richard Madeley, filmed from his garden.  The 69-year-old said: 'What an end to an incredible story. We were so passionate about trying to find your family for you.  Huge congratulations from Judy and from me. Have a great rest of your life and lots of love.'

Sarah was joined on the sofa by Ariel Bruce, the lead researcher from Long Lost Family who used Sarah's DNA to finally get her answers on her birth parents.  Speaking about her journey, Ariel said: 'Sarah trusted us with her search and that's the beginning. I'm very grateful to do this sort of work.  We put Sarah's DNA across the four being genealogical sites. We use a combination of those connection and conventional genealogy to build a forensic narrative.  It's a mixture of science, good luck and detective work. It's only the beginning of the story though. Having contact is just the beginning of a lifelong journey.'

11
Articles / The family who saved orphans from the Vietnam War
« on: June 28, 2025, 03:56:20 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3v5dn7qv9zo

The family who saved orphans from the Vietnam War

Simon Marks
BBC South

Published 30 May 2025

A family is marking the 50th year since a personal tragedy led to them adopting a baby from Vietnam.  RAF officer Mike Pritchard and his wife Jacquie from Chalgrove in Oxfordshire lost their baby son Steven to cot death while they were in Singapore in 1974.  In a tragic twist, Mrs Pritchard had been to hospital that same day for a sterilisation operation.  During the grief that followed they decided to do something positive. Knowing that the war in Vietnam had created many orphans, they made enquiries about adoption.  "A photograph was sent to us saying 'this is the baby you can have'," said Mrs Pritchard.

Mr Pritchard flew to Saigon to collect the boy, who they named Matthew.  "I held Matthew for the first time. His little eyes, I said 'you're the one for us'. Great, rubber stamped, done," explained Mr Pritchard.

But there was a snag. The paperwork would take six weeks, so Mr Pritchard had to fly back to Singapore without Matthew and wait.  Shortly afterwards, the couple heard news that a transport plane carrying orphan babies to America for safety had crashed with great loss of life.  They feared Matthew might have been on board. Mr Pritchard flew back to Saigon and learned that Matthew was safe. But he had been flown on a different plane to Sydney, Australia.  It was then that Mr Pritchard saw another opportunity.  "I said 'look I know I'll get out of here somehow. Do you want me to take some babies?" he said.

"I was asked, would I also take a 10-year-old blind boy?  I said yes of course! We headed for Hong Kong. All my babies in front of me in cardboard boxes.  A lot of people say I was very brave to do that. I just think I did what I needed to do."

The babies were eventually flown to Britain where they were collected by their new parents.  "Once I knew that these babies were safe with their adoptive families I thought 'this is where you step back'," said Mr Pritchard.

Back in Singapore, the couple waited for the plane that brought Matthew to them.  "We saw this woman walking along carrying this baby, she popped him in my arms and it was amazing," said Mrs Pritchard.

Brothers Philip and Matthew grew up together, attending boarding school and university in England.  Matthew remembers that as a child he attracted some attention.  "Looking back, I can understand people's curiosity. I'm Vietnamese and I've got British parents. But I just felt like a normal child that was loved and brought up", he said.

"The aspect of being rescued from a war zone never really crossed my mind. I feel very British. But I'm also very proud of my heritage and culture."

Matthews parents reflect with mixed emotions on the events of 1974.  "The tragedy of Steven dying. He didn't die in vain," said Mr Pritchard.

"Good always comes out of bad."

12
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14827645/Emotional-moment-man-discovers-location-birth-mother-abandoned-baby-not-ready-meet.html

Heartbreaking moment man, 58, finally finds birth mother who abandoned him as a baby but she doesn't want to meet him

    Simon Prothero was discovered in 1966 outside a children's home in Wales
    READ MORE: Woman abandoned in pram as a baby with a heartbreaking note from her impoverished mother finally meets her real siblings after 55 years

By ALANAH KHOSLA FOR MAILONLINE

Published: 11:24, 19 June 2025 | Updated: 11:48, 19 June 2025

A man was left heartbroken after finally locating his birth mother who abandoned him as a newborn baby in 1966 - only for her not to be ready to meet him.  Simon Prothero, 58, was discovered as a young baby outside a toilet block of a children's home in Neath, Wales. Up until recently, he had no information on why or who left him.  Soon after he was found, he was adopted by loving parents and grew up in a village just ten miles away from the children's home. When he was nine, they told him about the details behind his adoption.  Fortunately, Simon enjoyed a happy childhood with his late adoptive parents. But years later, his wife Helen encouraged him to apply to ITV's Long Lost Family: Born Without a Trace to help solve the mystery of his heritage.  'I don't know where I was born when I was born, what the circumstances were. I don't know who my mother is,' Simon said on the latest episode of the show, which aired on ITV yesterday at 9pm.

In September last year, Helen tragically died from cancer. Knowing Helen's wishes, Simon employed the help of Long Lost Family's team and hosts Davina McCall and Nicky Campbell to continue his search for his birth family.  DNA tracing meant that, despite Simon not having a paper trail, researchers managed to track down his birth mother, and Simon finally received the information about who his family are and where he came from.  However, in an emotional turn of events, Simon's birth mother, who is now in her eighties and had him when she was young, unmarried, and on her own without family support, was still not ready for contact with Simon.  At the start of the episode, Simon visited the children's home where he was found for the first time and reflected on his past.  He said, 'I believe I was only a few hours old when I was found', he said, adding, 'Nobody's ever come forward.  I think my mother lived local; I don't think a stranger would have found this place. It's so much to take in. I want to know why she felt like she had to give me up.'

The visit proved to be a poignant experience for Simon, who knew little about his beginnings, and up until recently, had never even seen a photograph of himself as a baby.  'I don't actually have any photographs of myself growing up as a baby, through my childhood, I haven't got anything,' he said.

Though he knew little about his life as a newborn, Simon did enjoy a happy childhood with 'loads of lovely memories'.  'My [adoptive] parents were very loving. They were really good parents, I had a very good upbringing,' he recalled.

When the researchers got to work looking for DNA connections, they also tried to find a photograph of Simon to allow him to see himself as a young baby for the first time.  Luckily, the team located a newsreel of baby Simon from 1966, allowing him to see footage of himself around the time he was found.  'That was the first time I've ever seen myself as a baby. Amazing. It looked as if I was cared for. It's mind blowing to be honest,' he said after watching the clip.

Back at the DNA search, a lead called Noel emerged, which connected Simon to a very large family group from north Wales.  Noel agreed to do a DNA test, which led researchers to identify Simon's birth mother, who is alive and in her eighties.  Researchers discovered that, when Simon was born, his birth mother was young, unmarried, on her own without family support, and the relationship with Simon's birth father had ended.  Unlike Simon's previous assumptions, his birth mother isn't from near the children's home in Neath, but from North Wales. She couldn't recall why she left him in that area.

When Long Lost Family contacted Simon's birth mother, her first reaction was sadly to question, 'Am I going to be in trouble for this?' The team reassured her that it wouldn't be the case.  Davina informed Simon of the findings and that his birth mother is not ready for contact yet, but that the Long Lost Family hope that she might be in the future. There was no information found regarding his birth father.  'I can't quite get my head around it,' Simon said. He added, I was hoping for some sort of answers and a little bit more on my background.  I would like to meet her, but obviously, if it's not meant to be, it's not meant to be. I can't take it in at all to be honest.  Hopefully we do get to meet, it would mean a lot,' Simon added.

Though Simon's birth mother wasn't ready to meet him, other family members, including Noel, gladly welcomed him into the family.  The Long Lost Family team didn't explain Simon's exact connection to Noel to protect his birth mother's identity.  At the end of the episode, Simon met three generations of his birth family's relatives and exchanged addresses with them.  Simon concluded, 'I've had a few answers, I'd like to have a few more, but it's been a good day,' he said.

13
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14809131/Man-36-charged-murder-13-month-old-boy.html

High school teacher, 36, is accused of sexually assaulting and murdering 13-month-old boy he was in the process of adopting

By OLIVIA CHRISTIE and SHANNON MCGUIGAN

Published: 10:24, 13 June 2025 | Updated: 14:43, 13 June 2025

A 36-year-old has been accused of sexually assaulting and murdering a 13-month-old baby boy he was in the process of adopting.  Jamie Varley of Lancashire has been charged with the murder of toddler, Preston Davey following his death in Blackpool on July 27, 2023.  The one-year-old was brought unresponsive into Blackpool Victoria Hospital at around 7.15pm that evening but tragically died shortly after.  Varley, who is a teacher, is also accused of multiple counts of assault, cruelty and indecent images all relating to the baby.  He was in the process of adopting Preston along with co-accused John McGowan-Fazakerley, 31, who also appeared in court.  The 36-year-old only spoke to confirm his identity during the brief, five-minute hearing at Lancaster Magistrates' Court on Friday.  The defendant, is also accused of one count of manslaughter, two counts of assault by penetration of a child, five counts of child cruelty, one count of inflicting grievous bodily harm, and one count of sexual assault of a child.  He is further accused of 10 counts of taking indecent photographs of a child, one count of distributing indecent photographs of a child, two counts of possessing indecent pseudo images of a child, and one count of possession of an extreme pornographic image.  District Judge Richard Thompson, addressing Varley, said: 'You are charged with a number of offences.  The murder of Preston Davey, manslaughter, assault by penetration, a number of sexual assaults, grievous bodily harm and also the possession, taking and distribution of indecent and extreme images.  You know what all the charges are and you understand them?'

Varley, who was wearing a beige polo shirt with collar-length dark hair with blond streaks, nodded in reply.  After he was taken down, his co-accused, McGowan-Fazakerley, was then brought into the dock for a second short hearing.  He is charged with allowing the death of a child, as well as two counts of child cruelty and one count of sexual assault of a child.  The defendant, wearing jeans and a sweatshirt patterned with images of owls and half-moons, confirmed his identity and was also remanded into custody.  All the charges for both men, spanning between March and July of 2023, relate to Preston Davey.  Varley was suspended as teacher at South Shore Academy in Blackpool when he was arrested in 2023, the Cidari Multi-Academy Trust which now runs the school said.  Both men, who lived in Grimsargh near Preston, will next appear at Preston Crown Court on Monday.  Chief Crown Prosecutor Suzanne Llewellyn previously said: 'The Crown Prosecution Service has authorised the prosecution of two men in relation to the death of a 13-month-old boy in Blackpool.  Jamie Varley, 36, of Grimsargh in Lancashire, has been charged with the murder of baby Preston Davey, in addition to a series of serious sexual and child cruelty offences.  John McGowan-Fazakerley, 31, of Grimsargh in Lancashire, has been charged with allowing the death of a child, in addition to child cruelty and sexual offences.  The Crown Prosecution Service has worked closely with Lancashire Police following a detailed police investigation, to review the available evidence and advise on the appropriate charges.  We recognise the profoundly distressing nature of the alleged crimes however we remind all concerned that criminal proceedings against these defendants are now active, and they have a right to a fair trial.  It is extremely important that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings.'

14
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14831519/Britain-hated-woman-buying-twin-babies.html

I was branded Britain's most hated woman for buying twin babies online for £8k in 'cash for babies scandal' here's what happened next

    Do YOU have a story? Email tips@dailymail.com

By STEWART WHITTINGHAM

Published: 16:04, 22 June 2025 | Updated: 17:08, 22 June 2025

She was branded the most hated woman in Britain after paying more than £8,000 to buy twin babies from the US on the internet.  Judith Kilshaw found herself at the centre of an international scandal after adopting the six-month old girls who had already been sold to a childless couple in America.  More than 20 years on, Judith admits her life had been 'plagued' by the global controversy which ended with her losing the children along with her home and her marriage.  But defiant Judith, 71, insists she has 'no regrets' and told how she has not given up hope of being reunited with the twins.  Speaking exclusively to MailOnline from her home in Wrexham, Judith told MailOnline: 'I have thought a lot about the case over the years and asked myself if I regretted doing it.  To a certain extent it has plagued my life it never goes away.  It was a nightmare to start with but time heals things. There's bigger things to think about.  But I have no regrets. I thought I could give the girls a better life and give them opportunities in life.  I would still love to talk to the girls to make sure they are OK and answer any questions they might have.  I am open to speaking to them but I have never spoken to them. But if they wanted to, I would love to get in touch.'

Judith and her solicitor husband Alan sparked a 'cash-for babies' outcry in 2001 after they paid £8,200 to adopt Kiara and Keyara Wecker.   They brought the twins, who they renamed Belinda and Kimberley, to Britain hoping to start a new life as a family at their seven-bedroom farmhouse in Buckley, north Wales.  But things did not go according to plan.  Then-prime minister Tony Blair called the adoption deal 'disgusting' and the twins were seized by social services and taken into emergency protection.  They were returned to the US after a High Court judge annulled the adoption.  Since then, Judith settled back into relative obscurity but much has happened in the intervening years, which can be revealed for the first time by MailOnline.  In the aftermath of the scandal, things were never quite the same for the couple and, saddled with debts over the affair, they were evicted from their farmhouse months later.  They moved into a bungalow in Chester but their 14-year marriage ended after Judith met a man 13 years her junior in a nightclub.  Despite the split, she remained close to Alan and was at his bedside when he died aged 63 in January 2019.  At the time she told of her sadness that he had never fulfilled his dream of meeting the girls again.  She said: 'He told me he had always regarded the twins as ours and his last wish was for me to go to America and try to make contact with them.  I don't know if this will be possible but I will do everything I can to honour his dying request.'

Before the baby storm erupted, the couple had lived an anonymous, if somewhat eccentric, middle-class life in rural north Wales.  They already had two sons and Judith had two grown up children from her first marriage.  The couple wanted to have a daughter together but Judith was too old to conceive.  They had spent £4,000 on unsuccessful IVF treatment and had looked into surrogacy before they turned to an online adoption agency in desperation.  The US-based agency called A Caring Heart was run by Tina Johnson who was acting on behalf of the mother of the mixed race twins, Tranda Wecker, who was aged 28 at the time.  Tranda, a hotel receptionist from Missouri, had fallen pregnant as her second marriage was coming to an end and had decided to part with her children.  Unbeknown to Judith and Alan, the broker had already arranged the adoption of the twins with Californian couple Richard and Vickie Allen.  They had paid £4,000 for the adoption and had cared for them for two months.  Tranda reportedly had a change of heart and, while the couple were in the process of finalising legal paperwork, she was given permission to say a final farewell to her daughters.  The American couple were told that Tranda wanted to spend two days with the twins - but instead they were handed to Judith and Alan.  They set off with the twins to get their birth certificates before making a gruelling 1,500-mile car journey to Little Rock Arkansas, where adoption is relatively easy, with the Allens in hot pursuit.  After a five-minute hearing the couple return to Britain with the twins and their adoption papers.  But the FBI were called in to probe the case amid a bitter transatlantic war of words and a legal battle over the girls' future.  The children were returned to the US in April 2001 where they were placed in foster care before a third set of parents eventually raised them.  Judith has always insisted she did nothing wrong or illegal and believed the adoption would be in the best interests of the twins.  But, in the aftermath of the affair, the couple racked up debts of £70,000.  They were forced to quit the farmhouse where they lived with three of Judith's children along with six dogs, more than a dozen cats, two ferrets, a horse, a pony and two pot-bellied pigs.  In the wake of her fight, Judith tried to get elected as an MP in 2005 after standing as an independent candidate in her local Alyn and Deeside constituency insisting she wanted to 'stand up for the little people'.  She split with Alan in 2006 and three years later she married Stephen Sillett, who was described at the time as a busker.  In the aftermath of the split, Judith was investigated for alleged benefits fraud arising from her living arrangements following the break-up.  In a bizarre twist, Alan gave his ex-wife away when she married Stephen at Wrexham Register Office in 2009.  She had a volatile relationship with her third husband and in 2012, Judith pleaded guilty at Wrexham Magistrates Court to assaulting Stephen after hitting over the head with a Christmas bauble following a row.  Stephen had accused Judith, who now goes by her married name Sillett, of having an affair, she says.  Judith told MailOnline: 'It was hardly crime of the century. He probably deserved it.  However we stayed together. We are still legally married but have split up.  We're still friends and speak all the time.'

Meanwhile Alan had been struck down with pulmonary fibrosis, a serious lung disease, which left him in hospital for months before his death.  Judith told how Stephen became jealous as she nursed her ex husband through his illness which led to her giving up her job as a cleaner in the Co-op.  She told MailOnline: 'There were three of us in the relationship and men can't really handle that can they?  I think he didn't like the attention I was giving Alan.'

Of her life now she added: 'I now live with my son. I don't work as I have retired but I'm a bit of an agony aunt to all my friends.'

Speaking from his terraced home in a village near Wrexham, Stephen, now 58, said: 'We're still legally married but are not together anymore.  I don't think we can afford to get divorced.'

Judith heard nothing more about the fate of the twins until 2018 when it was revealed they were starting university after being brought up by a loving churchgoing family in Missouri.  Their adoptive mother said at the time: 'They have grown into fine young women, each with their own dreams and ambitions.'

Since then two TV documentaries have been made about the case one called Three Mothers, two Babies and a Scandal, which was shown on Amazon Prime in 2022 while a second named The Baby Scandal That Shocked The World was screened on Channel 5 last year.  Judith told MailOnline: 'The case and furore of it all, never really goes away.  In fact I was recognised by a woman in the supermarket the other day.  She kept on staring at me, trying to work out who I was. Then she spoke to me asking if I was the woman from the babies case.  She recognised me from being on telly a few years ago, but it was positive. She said I came across really well.'

15
General Discussion / Pro-Adoption Terminology
« on: June 20, 2025, 04:39:35 PM »
https://ellecuardaigh.com/2017/06/29/pro-adoption-terminology/comment-page-1/#respond

Pro-Adoption Terminology
by ellecuardaigh   

If you find yourself somehow involved in adoption, you will need to learn a new language: Pro-Adoption Language. These same words in the rest of society have completely different meanings. It is very important to know the correct terms, or people get their feelings hurt and the Culture of Adoption suffers.

Adoption: The act of legally severing ties to biological parents and replacing them with strangers who become the Real Parents.

Abortion: 1) Terminating what would have been the perfect child that the Adoptive Parent always wanted. 2) The thing all Adopted Children have been saved from.

*Adopted Child: Baby who was placed in the Wrong Tummy and was saved from Abortion by the Real Parents.

Adoptee: Newer, discouraged term for an Adopted Child.

Adopted Adult: ....what?

Birthmother or Birth Mother: A lesser mother, inferior to an Adoptive or Real Mother.

Birth Father: The man who gave birth to the Adopted Child.

Grateful: What good Adopted Children are. Forever.

Pregnancy: The condition of incubation that brings an Adopted Child to their Forever Family. See also: The Wrong Tummy.

Growing Your Family Through Adoption: Method of increasing numbers in a nuclear family through non-biological means. See also: Legal Human Trafficking.

Original Birth Certificate: The wrong birth certificate.

Amended Birth Certificate: The only birth certificate.

Real Parents: The Adoptive Parents. Continues to apply after death, divorce, abandonment, or criminal acts against the Adoptive Child. Can only be nullified through Rehoming by the Real-But-Regretful Parents.

Rehoming: Recycling Adopted Children online when they weren't the perfect puppy  accessory their Forever Parents thought they would be. Not to be confused with Failed Adoption.

Called To Adopt: God telling people (mainly White, American, Christian, married, heterosexual people) that He put babies in the Wrong Tummy for them to rescue from abortion or living outside the US.

Spirit of Adoption: Line found in Romans 8:15 that completely justifies the appropriation of other people's children. Cross reference: Job 24:9.

Surrogate: The Birth Mother in cases of deliberately created half-adoptees. Less used: Gestational Mother or Rent-A-Womb. See also: Concubine.

Donor: Someone who is paid for their procreative genetic bits, to be used elsewhere.

Sperm Donor: Handsome medical students who don't really need the money but take it anyway, for the act of beating off into a cup. See also: Birth Father.

Egg Donor: Woman who is given monetary compensation that nearly covers the physical/emotional trauma of extracting eggs from her body. See also: Birth Mother.

Infertility: A condition that can only be cured by heeding the Call To Adopt.

Adoption Fundraiser: Begging for the money necessary to bring home the Adopted Child to their Forever Family, which could not possibly be used instead to help the Birth Mother raise the child – yeah, just forget I said that.

Failed Adoption: Would-be Adopted Child who stayed with the Birth Mother, thus destroying hopes and dreams of the Real Parents.

Successful Adoption: Completed transaction where the legal and biological ties between the Adopted Child and Birth Family are obliterated.

Clear Title: Legalese meaning no other claims on an Adopted Child and/or motor vehicles.

Biology: Base origins that do not matter.

DNA: Unfortunate genetic markers that make up our entire beings that still do not matter.

Searching: How Adopted Children hurt their Real Parents.

Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD): Condition afflicting Adoptive Children that is never, ever the fault of the

Love: The only emotion involved in Adoption, which negates any other feeling that may arise, and also fixes any problem, except RAD.

Triad: Triangle representing the three sides of Adoption. Note: always scalene.

Orphan: All Internationally Adopted Children, who are saved by being brought to America and raised White. Can have up to two living biological parents. Also possible to find out upon adulthood they aren't as "Real" as they thought they were and subject to deportation.

Make An Adoption Plan: What Birthmothers do of their own free will, with absolutely no coercion involved. Sometimes referred to as TPR.

Reunion: Misnomer for the sometimes unfortunate end to Searching, since one cannot "reunite" with someone they never knew. Better term: Breaking Real Parents' Hearts.

Abandon: What all Birth Mothers do while Making An Adoption Plan.

Chosen: How Adopted Children feel about being Abandoned. See also: Lucky.

Secrets, Lies, and Vetoes: Ways to keep Adopted Children in their rightful place permanently infantilized. See also: Narcissism.

*Oh, I apologize. Apparently "Adopted Child" has also fallen out of favor. Now the preferred term is "MY CHILD" because making someone feel owned is the ultimate in parenting. Notice the individual is still a child. Also, note they were adopted, not are adopted, because adoption status expires upon adulthood when the individual becomes either the biological offspring of the adoptive parents through Adoption Magic, or the non-person they always were, in which case they are "bitter."

Elle Cuardaigh is author of The Tangled Red Thread, and yes, she is bitter.

Post-Script: This is was written as an indictment against the false-positive language that has evolved as the Adoption Industry has grown. It has happened to keep the machinery running to keep those Adoptlings coming down the chute and to keep those in the business employed. This has nothing to do with the good people I know who have adopted with the best of intentions and eyes wide open, including my own adoptive parents who never tried to force any of this double-speak on me.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 49