Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Articles / Korean adoptees in the US and Europe are finding their families ....
« Last post by RDsmum on August 22, 2025, 05:18:20 PM »
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/08/01/asia/south-korean-adoptees-reuniting-families-reconnecting-harder-hnk?Date=20250802&Profile=CNN+International&utm_content=1754116201&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwY2xjawMVcH5leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHgV0MT1NhJZ33LnR0o2N9nJZxAsrdKmAPk96WBbaCC3OXms7XltAcTaqwDc4_aem_gwatN_9uiferkDXBz6inrQ

Korean adoptees in the US and Europe are finding their families. Reconnecting is much harder
By Yoonjung Seo, Hanna Park and Hilary Whiteman, CNN
Updated 7:36 PM EDT, Sat August 2, 2025
Seoul CNN 

Marianne Ok Nielsen never wanted children, or a family of her own. She used to tell friends she didn’t feel worthy of that kind of life.  For most of her 52 years, she believed she’d been abandoned by her parents as a baby; found on the street in 1973 by police in Daejeon, South Korea, a city about 90 miles south of the capital Seoul.  “I was discarded like garbage. Nobody wanted me.  That’s what I was,” said Nielsen, who grew up in Denmark, the home of her adoptive parents. “When your mom doesn’t even want you, who would want you? Can you then be loved by anyone?”

Her Danish mother, who passed away last year, once told Nielsen that her birth mother had probably “given her up out of love” because she couldn’t afford to raise her.  It was a story likely told to console a child, but one that provided cover to a lucrative business built on the “mass exportation” of babies some with fake names and birth dates to foreign parents in at least 11 countries, South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission reported this year, in the first official recognition of the scale of the injustice.  The commission found more than 141,000 Korean children were sent abroad between the 1950s and 1990s, primarily to the United States and Europe. In a society that shunned unwed mothers, some women were pressured to give up their infants soon after giving birth. Others grieved stolen children.   Han Tae-soon, 73, still recalls the sound of her 4-year-old daughter’s laughter as she skipped off to play with friends outside their home in Cheongju, South Korea, a provincial city about 70 miles south of Seoul, in 1975.  “I was heading to the market and left Kyung-ha with a couple of her friends,” Han told CNN. “When I returned, my daughter was gone.”

Han, then 22, would not see Kyung-ha again until decades had weathered them both. Nielsen, seeking her own family in circumstances similar to Han’s, also finally met the mother she thought had dumped her like trash.  After a lifetime of separation, the cruelty of South Korea’s foreign adoptions is only now becoming clear as reunited children and mothers struggle to communicate through different languages and cultures.  Han’s baby now has a life of her own in America. And in Nielsen’s case, time and old age have robbed her mother of most memories she ever existed.

A fake abandonment

Growing up in the small Danish town of Gedved, Nielsen said she longed to be “more Danish than the Danes.”

“I would avoid looking myself in the mirror because I was trying so desperately to be White trying so desperately to convince everybody else that I was White,” she said. If her parents didn’t want her, she didn’t want anything to do with them or Korea.

Nielsen said she didn’t question her origins until, when she was an adult, a four-year-old boy the son of a man she was dating asked where her birth mother was.  When she explained that she couldn’t find her because no records remained, the boy said, “If somebody had done that to me, I would cry all the time!”

In that moment, Nielsen realized she’d suppressed her feelings her entire life. “Maybe a small baby inside of me has also been crying all the time,” she said.

In 2016, she took a DNA test through 325Kamra, a US-based non-profit organization helping Korean adoptees to reunite with families.  For years, there were no results. But last May, everything changed.  She received a text message: “A possible family match has been found.”

Her older brother had registered his DNA with Korean police, hoping to locate his missing sister.  Nielsen had finally found her family.  “For 51 years, I believed I was abandoned in the street, that I was an orphan. I never imagined in a million years that I had a family, and that they had been searching for me,” she said.

An alleged abduction

When Han’s daughter Kyung-ha went missing, the family combed watermelon fields near their home, fearing she may have wandered off and drowned in a waste tank.  Han visited police stations daily, begging for help to find her missing child. But when pressed for information, authorities suggested she consult fortune tellers for answers, she said.  In 1981, she opened a hair salon in Anyang, southwest of the capital, and hung an old photo of Kyung-ha in the mirror for customers to see.   She visited radio stations, distributed flyers, and appeared on a television program in 1990 that led to a tip and a painful deception. A 20-year-old woman came forward to claim she was Kyung-ha, and when questioned by Han, seemed to give enough answers to confirm her identity. “I asked, ‘What does your dad do?’ and she said, ‘He drives a taxi.’ So, I brought her back with me,” Han said.

Han’s husband, however, was unconvinced. “That’s not Kyung-ha,” he told her as she stepped through the gate of their home.

Still, Han, desperate for closure, opened her home to the stranger.  Han would not learn the truth until two years later, when the young woman prepared for her wedding.  “The moment I saw you, I thought, ‘I wish that woman were my mom,’ so I lied,” she admitted, Han said.

The woman, who had been abandoned at an orphanage by her own mother, packed her belongings and left town.  So, like Nielsen, Han turned to DNA testing through 325Kamra for proof of a genetic link.  Like Nielsen, Han found a match.  Her missing daughter Kyung-ha was now living in the United States under the name given to her by her adoptive parents, Laurie Bender.  Bender’s child had submitted her mother’s DNA to the same agency nearly a decade ago in search of answers, Han said.  In all the years Han searched for her child, she said she never thought to look beyond South Korea.  “I thought she might have been taken in by a childless couple within Korea or, if she was alive, living somewhere in the country,” Han said. “The idea of adoption especially international adoption never crossed my mind.”

Bender did not respond to CNN’s interview request, but in 2019 she told South Korean television network MBC that on May 9, 1975, she’d “followed a lady onto a train.”

“I ended up going to the end of the line at the train station. I went to the police station that was right there, and they put me in a Jeep and took me to the orphanage,” she said.

Han alleges the woman lured 4-year-old Kyung-ha to a train station in Jecheon, roughly 40 miles from their home, and abandoned her. “Even now, I don’t know who that lady was,” Han said.

Han says the police drove Kyung-ha to Jecheon Infant Home, then headed by director Jane White, an American missionary. Records show that in February 1976, nine months after her disappearance, the child was sent to the US.  The travel document issued by South Korea’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which authorizes international travel for adoption, replaced her last name, in Korean, with that of White, and listed the address of Holt Children’s Services as her own.  Jecheon Infant Home told CNN in a statement that White, now 89, is unable to move or communicate after suffering a “sudden illness” in April 2020.  “Since no one other than Jane White can accurately confirm the details of that period, we ask for your understanding that we are unable to respond to Ms. Han Tae-soon’s allegations,” the statement said.

CNN has reached out to Holt Children’s Services for comment.
Identities lost, falsified and fabricated

Holt International was founded in the 1950s by American couple Harry and Bertha Holt, Christians who adopted eight Korean children after the Korean War and set out to replicate their experience for other families.

At the time, South Korea was recovering from grinding post-war poverty, and records show a notable increase in international adoptions as the country’s authoritarian rulers pushed for rapid economic growth in the 1970s and ’80s.

In 1977, Holt International separated from its Korean entity, Holt Children’s Services. Last October, Holt International said in a statement it was one of many private agencies facilitating “adoptions from Korea during the 1980s.”

“Reports of unethical or illegal adoption practices” were “alarming,” the statement said, but added that many news reports omit the social pressures on unwed mothers to give up their babies.

“We remain committed to assisting Korean adoptees and adoptive parents with their questions and concerns,” Holt International told CNN in a statement.

The commission found that Korea’s Special Adoption Act for Orphans in 1961 expedited international adoptions after the Korean War and later included the babies of unwed mothers, abandoned infants and children deemed to need “protection.”  All adoption-related processes were entrusted to private adoption agencies which lost, falsified or fabricated the identities and family information of many children, the commission’s report said.  Large numbers of children endured long flights without proper care, according to the report, which included a black-and-white image of infants strapped into airline seats on a flight out of South Korea to Denmark in 1984.  Yooree Kim, now 52, remembers being on a similar flight to France, and trying to comfort the crying babies strapped into seats next to her by stroking their faces and letting her hair brush against their skin.    Then 11, Kim was much older than the babies around her. She and her younger brother had a happy early childhood in Korea, but after their parents divorced, they moved in with their grandparents.  When their grandmother was diagnosed with tuberculosis, they went back to their mother, but money was tight, so she placed them in a private childcare facility in May 1983.  The move was supposed to be temporary, but by that Christmas, Kim and her brother would be sent to France.  Kim said she was told their parents had “abandoned” them. She said she was abused by her adoptive father in France, allegations he denied before his death in 2022, according to Kim.  Ten years after her adoption, Kim returned to Seoul in 1994 and discovered the truth.  “When I first met my mother, she cried and told me she had nothing to do with my adoption.  My father got down on his knees and apologized. He told me he had nothing to do with it either,” she said.

Kim said her mother told her she used to work at an orphanage and trusted the facility to take care of her children, but when she went back to retrieve them, they had gone.  For Kim, finding her family wasn’t enough. She wants full transparency from everyone involved in what she calls a traumatic and deeply flawed process.  While the commission does not have mandating powers, it recommended that the government and private adoption agencies apologize for their role in violating children’s rights.  South Korean adoptions are now subject to stronger oversight. Under a law passed in 2023, private agencies must transfer all remaining records of international adoptions to the National Center for the Rights of the Child, a government agency, this month.  And from October, South Korea will be bound by the Hague Intercountry Adoption Convention that sets international standards to protect children against abduction, trafficking or sale.  But families torn apart by forced adoptions say that’s not enough.  “I want an apology and compensation,” Kim told CNN.

The reunions

After several phone calls with Han, Bender flew to Seoul in 2019, where the pair reunited at the airport. Han had held on to the image of her daughter as the lively 4-year-old clinging to her skirt. But she was faced with a woman shaped by 44 years of separation.  “The first thing I asked her was, ‘Why did you go to America?’ I had never imagined she could be there,” Han said.

Her hands, trained by three decades of hairdressing, sought proof of her daughter’s identity that her eyes couldn’t provide. Stroking her daughter’s head, tracing her scalp and even feeling the shape of her ears, Han was certain. “This time, it was really my child. The texture of her hair can’t be stolen.”

A pair of shoes further confirmed Bender was Kyung-ha. She’d kept the shoes she wore on the day she went missing.  “The rubber had deteriorated after 44 years. They had crumbled and flattened, but the shape was still there. She had kept the shoes all this time,” Han said. “Can you imagine how much she must have wanted to find her parents?”

Han, who carries herself with unabashed resolve, speaks with a feisty candor after years spent grappling with grief.  She is angered by the lost time and the language barrier that now stands between her and her American daughter.  “If we hadn’t been separated back then, I would be able to say everything I want to her now,” Han said. “But now, even when I try to talk to her, there’s so much misunderstanding. Even after reuniting, we feel like strangers because we can’t truly communicate.”

Han still resides in Anyang, tending to a life shaped by loss. Her spotless three-bedroom apartment, tucked in a quiet complex, is filled with photos of Bender’s younger brother and sister. Bender’s photos are there, too, but a gap exists between images of her as a baby and the adult she is today.  Last October, Han was among the first known Korean birth parents to sue the government, the orphanage and Holt Children’s Services the country’s largest adoption agency for damages over wrongful adoption. Her case is due to return to court in September.  For Han, the fight is not just a way to reckon with her loss it’s about accountability. She’s seeking monetary damages but says no amount of compensation will make up for what was taken from her.  “I want to reveal the truth. Why? Because the government stole children and sold them,” she claims. “They didn’t choose to go adoption was forced upon them by the government.”

“Still, if I win the lawsuit, it might bring me a little bit of comfort a small sense of relief,” Han said. “The government needs to acknowledge its wrongdoing and apologize properly.”

Han says Bender supports her fight but doesn’t understand Korean and doesn’t know the culture or laws of her former home.  “She welcomes what I’m doing. She doesn’t oppose it,” Han said.

Nielsen also struggles to communicate with the mother she believed had abandoned her. Her 93-year-old mother has dementia and does not remember the baby she once lost.   Over time, Nielsen has pieced together more about her background.  In August 1973, her mother fell ill with an infectious disease and, fearing for her newborn’s safety, temporarily entrusted her to social services.  By December of the same year, the child was sent to Denmark, according to Nielsen. Just weeks later, her frantic mother filed a missing persons report with police.  Nielsen’s name and date of birth had been changed on the government-issued travel certificate. As in Bender’s case, the travel document listed her address as the location of Holt Children’s Services. CNN has also asked Holt Children’s Services for further information about Nielsen’s case.  Nielsen is back in Daejeon, to be closer to her mother and to let her know that she holds no anger or blame over the past. But she’s frustrated by the language barrier between them, leaving them unable to understand each other.  “The theft of the language is so profound because the language is a door into the culture,” she said. “The intimacy of being able to speak to my mom is completely gone. So that is what is a big, big loss for me.  My human rights have been completely violated.”

Nielsen is learning Korean, attending weekly classes with a study group, so she can find the few words of comfort for her ailing mother. Sometimes, no words are needed.  Nielsen still remembers the first night she slept next to her birth mother.  “I didn’t sleep much. I just watched (her) I could look at her and feel, ‘That’s my mom.’ There was no doubt about it,” she said.
2
Articles / 'Charity help changed everything for our daughter'
« Last post by Forgotten Mother on August 16, 2025, 08:35:27 PM »
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0e9q9rr488o

'Charity help changed everything for our daughter'
Alexandra Bassingham BBC News, West of England Kelly Withers BBC News, Somerset

A couple said the support they received from a charity helping children with neurological and developmental difficulties "changed everything" for their daughter.  Luke, 40, and Alex, 42, from West Sussex, said they were struggling to know how to help their adopted daughter Octavia, eight, when they noticed she had early life developmental delay.  They approached the charity Bibic, in Langport, Somerset, in November 2022, who "instantly got it", they said, creating a sound therapy programme that helped Octavia with her anxiety and hypervigilance.  "We just can't get our heads around the difference it has made to us as a family," Luke said.

"At the start, we didn't know whether her behaviour was trauma, birth or neuro related," Luke said.

He said Bibic staff were "very available from our first phone call to them".  "Then when we got to assessment they spent two whole days with us which is unheard of," he said.

The couple, who also have another adopted daughter, said the charity gave them all the information they and her school needed.  This was done without Octavia "being labelled or put on medication", Luke said.

Fight or flight

She was given a sound therapy programme involving bespoke music, called Johansen Individualised Auditory Stimulation.  It helps children who may have had problems processing speech and sounds.  Luke said Octavia had been living in fight or flight mode due to early trauma but 10 months after the start of her treatment, she was no longer in a constant state of hypervigilance and anxiety.  He said she went from being unable to fit into a school environment to going into Year 2 "like nothing had happened".

Bibic has just launched a campaign to raise £25,000 in a month to fill a funding gap, following unsuccessful grant applications.  Gemma Pack, senior fundraising officer, said: "We receive no government or statutory funding at all so everything we need to run the charity we have to find ourselves and that's really difficult in a post-Covid world."

She said following the pandemic, the charity's waiting list soared to 68 weeks and after expanding their team to meet demand, it is now down to 10 weeks.  However, the waiting list is now threatened again by the funding shortfall, she said.
3
Articles / Adoption support charity shreds 'irreplaceable' files to save space
« Last post by RDsmum on August 07, 2025, 03:49:50 PM »

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj4wn00pz48o?fbclid=IwY2xjawMBl8xleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETBUZ2JwbHRHZTJNZUFVbllCAR5uOepqGb8xdLWn744u9qd5-GX1KUZpLrWrHO9b6JQez5sceBDHFgWblcMrLw_aem_-mgwWygh8ZTlH9A6dqiedQ

Adoption support charity shreds 'irreplaceable' files to save space
David Cowan
BBC Scotland home affairs correspondent

A charity has apologised for the "inexcusable" destruction of around 4,800 personal records linked to adoptions in Scotland, including irreplaceable photographs and handwritten letters from birth parents.  Edinburgh-based Birthlink has been fined £18,000 after shredding the files to free up space in its filing cabinets four years ago.  The Information Commissioners' Office (ICO), which imposed the fine, described the lost material as "deeply personal pieces in the jigsaw of a person's history, some now lost for eternity".

The charity's board said it was "deeply sorry" and that it was impossible to say how many people were affected.  A statement added: "We want to assure everyone who's interacted with Birthlink that we will do everything in our power to ensure this does not happen again."

A spokesperson for the Movement for Adoption Apology Scotland campaign said: "These items weren't stored out of administrative duty, but held in the hope that one day, someone would come looking.  That hope has now been shredded, quite literally."

Files destroyed

Birthlink did not keep a log of what was destroyed but it believes only "a very small proportion" of the records included personal documents, which do not exist in any form elsewhere.  Since 1984, the company has operated the Adoption Contact Register for Scotland.  It enables adopted people, birth parents and others to register their details with a view to being "linked" and potentially reunited.  If a connection was made, Birthlink retained what were called "linked records" closed paper files stored in filing cabinets in case they could be of further use in the future.  But by January 2021, the charity was running out of space and reviewed whether it could destroy the files.  Following a board meeting, it was agreed that only replaceable records could be disposed of.  PA Media Nicola Sturgeon, who is wearing a maroon dress with a round neck, addresses MSPs in the Scottish parliament debating chamber. She has brown hair, with blond highlights.  A few months later, the contents of 24 filing cabinet drawers were bagged up and shredded.  Birthlink has estimated that personal data from around 4,800 individuals was destroyed and that less than 10% of the lost files contained "cherished items".  These include photographs, handwritten letters from birth mothers and fathers to their children and handwritten letters from birth families to siblings.  Another 8,300 files survived the process unscathed.  The culling of the records only came to light two years later, after the Care Inspectorate carried out a short-notice inspection at Birthlink in September 2023.  An internal investigation, ordered by Birthlink's interim chief executive, found that a member of staff had expressed concern about shredding photographs and other records at the time.  But they were told "it needed to be done".

Birthlink reported itself to the ICO, who said the charity could have prevented the destruction with "cost effective and easy to implement" policies and procedures.  The regulator imposed a £45,000 fine, later reduced to £18,000, to promote compliance with data protection and deter others from "making similar mistakes".

'Poor understanding'

Sally Anne Poole, the ICO's head of investigations, said: "The destroyed records had the potential to be an unknown memory, an identity, a sense of belonging, answers.  It is inconceivable to think, due to the very nature of its work, that Birthlink had such a poor understanding of both its data protection and records management process."

The ICO welcomed the steps taken by Birthlink to ensure it does not happen again, including new policies and the appointment of a data protection officer.  Birthlink's interim CEO Abbi Jackson told BBC Scotland News that the charity mainly worked with people affected by "historic forced adoption" between 1930 and 1980.  She said: "We want to reiterate our deepest and most sincere regret that this happened.  We have failed people who put their trust in us. We want to urge anyone who thinks they should have had information on file to phone our helpline.  We have a number of very experienced, knowledgeable staff who're there to help on each individual case."

In 2023, the then First Minister Nicola Sturgeon issued a "sincere, heartfelt and unreserved" apology to people affected by the practice of forced adoption.  The Movement for Adoption Apology Scotland campaign said: "The emotional and historical significance of what was lost cannot be overstated.  These were not administrative items, but the last remaining traces of relationships shattered by policies and practices that many now acknowledge as unjust and highly traumatising."

Anyone worried about the loss of personal information can contact Birthlink's support service through dataprotection@birthlink.org.uk
4
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14959693/Adopting-son-left-depressed-stop-crying-thought-Id-seen-failed-mum-realised-truth-battle-JODIE-BRAIN.html#newcomment

Adopting my son left me depressed I couldn't stop crying. I thought I'd be seen as a failed mum then I realised truth behind my battle: JODIE BRAIN

By JODIE BRAIN

Published: 01:44, 1 August 2025 | Updated: 10:33, 1 August 2025

And I should have been happy this is all I'd wanted, for so long. For ten, long, painful years of infertility I'd dreamed and prayed for this moment, when I'd finally be a mother.  But now little Charlie was here I just felt empty.  It's a sadly not uncommon lament from a first-time mother. Post-natal depression is a well-documented and cruel affliction, affecting one in ten women in the year after they give birth, and caused by multiple factors, including fluctuating hormones, anxiety and lack of sleep.  But I hadn't given birth. We'd adopted Charlie five months earlier, when he was ten months old. Yet all the symptoms of post-natal depression were there.  Even my GP was confounded; he asked me what I wanted him to do to help me. If he didn't know, I certainly didn't. I just wanted someone to tell me what was wrong.  Eventually, I was diagnosed with post-adoption depression, or PAD, by my GP. It is a condition so rarely spoken about even medical professionals seemed unsure how to handle it.  Yet it is real different from post-natal depression, but just as valid and as painful.  My husband Darrell, now 38, and I had married in 2008 and started trying for a baby straight away. Every month that passed without a positive test was another blow. At first, we were hopeful; after all we were young and healthy.  After 12 months, we went to the doctor, who kept telling us to be patient, that it would happen.  But it didn't. We tracked my cycle, spent a fortune on ovulation and pregnancy tests every month and timed everything perfectly, but nothing worked.  Every month, I cried when my period came, and Darrell would hug me. It just seemed so unfair; we ran out of ways to reassure each other.  We didn't tell anyone we were struggling until my sister announced she was pregnant in 2016. That day, the floodgates opened and I broke down in tears to my mum. She had no idea what we had been going through. With no small children in the family, the topic had never come up.  At the time, I worked in a baby room within a nursery. Every day I was looking after other people's babies, cuddling them, caring for them then handing them back. It was heartbreaking, so much so that I quit my job and went to work in M&S.  Finally, at the beginning of 2018, when I was 29, we made our first visit to a fertility clinic, where doctors confirmed there was zero chance we would ever conceive naturally and IVF was our only option. But, even then, there was no guarantee.  It was painful to hear that my body couldn't do what a woman's body was 'meant' to do, and that we had wasted so much time and money pursuing something that was never going to happen. Yet knowing also gave us clarity at least we could now work out the next steps.  Because of the postcode lottery in the Cotswolds where we live, we would only get one free try of IVF on the NHS after that we'd have to pay privately.  With a single round costing anywhere from £4,000, that simply wasn't an option for us; I was working in retail and Darrell as a warehouse manager, and we certainly didn't have a huge pot of savings to dip into. If we paid for the IVF, we would have been left with no money to raise a child. Plus, I didn't want to put my body through something that might not work.  That's when I realised being a mother doesn't necessarily mean you have to be pregnant.  As we drove home from the fertility clinic, I turned to Darrell and said: 'Let's look into adoption then.'

We had never mentioned it before, but now it was the obvious choice. We just really wanted to be parents and build our own family whatever form that took.  When we started researching, we decided we didn't want to foster-to-adopt – where you foster a young baby, in the hope you can later adopt them a process that leaves a chance that the child could be handed back to their birth parents if circumstances change. I knew that after so long trying for a baby, it would kill me if that were to happen.  So we decided to try to adopt a child under the age of three, never dreaming we would get a baby.  The adoption process was intense. We had to share everything our relationship history, finances, even our childhood experiences. We were assigned a social worker and went through hours of preparation training, psychological evaluations and home checks.  It took a full year to be approved as adopters. Then came another year of waiting during the matching process. It was a bit surreal almost like a dating site. There's a database where each child has a profile including a photo, personality traits and health notes. As prospective parents, we had our own profiles, too, listing our jobs, home and lifestyle.  At first, we avoided looking at photos. We wanted to choose based on compatibility, not appearances. But then I saw a photo of a little boy around three months old. He had the most adorable smile with dimples on both cheeks and my heart stopped. 'That's our boy,' I told my husband I just knew.

Funnily enough, the family finder had already bookmarked us as a potential match for him. It felt like fate.  We expressed interest in March 2020. Then the pandemic hit, and lockdown delayed everything. We couldn't even meet him in person until that September. In the meantime, we sent him a photo book of us and our home, and a cuddly fox toy that we hoped he would bond with.  When we finally met him at his foster carers' home, Charlie was nine months old. He was asleep in the front room when we got there, and we peeked through the glass door and saw him in his chair.  When he woke, one of the carers brought him in and put him on the floor to play. She wanted him to make his way to us when he was ready and, to my delight, he crawled straight over to us.  I had been so worried that after years of working as a nursery nurse I'd feel detached, but the feeling was like nothing I'd ever experienced before.  He wasn't just another baby; he felt like ours.  We stayed nearby for nine days, gradually increasing our time with him. After that, his foster carers brought him to stay in a hotel near us, and he visited each day to get used to our home.  On the day after he moved in, he turned ten months old. It was October 2020, and he was officially our son. I felt like I was on cloud nine, finally a mum after so many years of hoping and dreaming.  We'd had his bedroom prepared for months, and that first night Darrell and I had planned to take it in turns to see to Charlie when he woke up. Every time he cried, however, we were both up and ready to settle him together. No one got much sleep that night, but we were so happy.  With experience working with children, I knew I'd manage the practical side the bottles and nappies but I was nervous about how love would develop.  In the end, it came easily. We bonded quickly and it felt like he'd always been part of our lives.  Still, our transition into parenthood was abrupt. We'd spent ten years preparing in our minds but, in reality, we had just two-and-a-half weeks between being officially matched and having a baby in our home.  At first, I was too busy to notice how I felt. I had nine months' maternity leave to learn his routines, likes and dislikes, and adapt to the seismic shift in my life and identity.  Five months in, however, around the time the adoption was finalised in March 2021, making Charlie legally ours, cracks began to show.  I started crying regularly. I felt confused and flat, and I couldn't relate to the other mums at baby groups. While they talked about breastfeeding and labour stories, I had nothing to add. I felt like an outsider.  It wasn't that I was treated differently, but the conversations would invariably go towards why Charlie was adopted, and what had happened with his birth mother, who had been unable to care for him, though I never shared any details with them it wasn't my story to share.  I was also careful not to reveal we'd been trying to have a baby for ten years, as I definitely didn't want people feeling sorry for me.  By the time my son was 17 months old, I was due to return to work – and that's when the depression really took hold. I didn't want to leave him. I'd waited so long to be a mum and now I was supposed to hand him over to Darrell, while I worked evening shifts.  Darrell was a hands-on dad, and was brilliant with Charlie, so I couldn't work out why I was so worried about leaving him.  Part of my depression manifested as obsession. I had to do everything myself every feed, bath and bedtime. I felt like I had a duty to do it, because I was now Charlie's mum. Darrell was always happy to take on the routine, but I just found it so hard to let go.  It got to the point where I was crying all the time and didn't want to go out. I stopped attending mum and baby groups altogether.  No one around me seemed to understand. Friends sympathised with the challenges of sleepless nights and toddler tantrums, but not with the intensity and emotional roller-coaster of the adoption process. How could they?

They'd never been through it.  By this point, we had little to no contact with social workers, as the adoption order had been granted. But in the back of my mind there was always the thought that if I reached out to them, they might see me as a failure of a mother. Looking back, I realise that was a ridiculous thought, but in the moment that's how I truly felt.  That's when I eventually called my GP in tears. Because of Covid, I couldn't visit in person, so I sobbed down the phone.  After asking me what I wanted them to do, they offered talking therapy, which I tried. But it was geared towards post-natal depression based on hormonal shifts, traumatic births or breastfeeding struggles.  I needed someone to acknowledge that I had just become a mother through adoption and that it came with its own set of emotional challenges.  So, on the GP's recommendation, I started taking antidepressants, which saved me from going to a darker place.  I also found online groups for adoptive parents and, finally, I felt understood.  Other mums shared their own experiences of PAD, and suddenly my feelings didn't seem so strange.  I was lucky to have such a supportive husband in Darrell. After a decade trying for a baby, a lengthy adoption process, plus PAD, I knew it could have been very different but thankfully it was the making of our marriage.  Slowly, things began to shift. The antidepressants helped while I got my home and work-life balance in order, but then I started to feel numb. I'd gone from crying all the time to feeling nothing. I didn't even shed a tear when watching an emotional film.  Darrell tried to support me the best he could as much as I let him in and I know he was desperately worried about me.  So, after taking the medication for two months, and with advice from my GP, I weaned myself off the antidepressants.  After six long months, I learned to give myself a break and finally enjoy being in the moment with my boy, rather than worrying and obsessing about what I was missing when I wasn't there.  I was Charlie's mum and as good and as fallible as any other mother, whatever path I'd taken to build my family.  Now, our son is five-and-a-half. He knows he's adopted, and is happy to talk about it. He tells people 'Mummy and Daddy chose me,' which I love.

We have letterbox contact with his biological parents once a year and will continue for as long as he's happy to do so.  We currently have no plans to have face-to-face contact, but if that's something he wants to do when he's an adult, we're open to having that conversation then.  I love that he's proud of his story, and I now speak openly about the adoption process and the joys it's brought us.  It's not always considered by couples struggling to conceive, but it's been the best decision we ever made.  I'm also open about post-adoption depression, how it's perfectly OK not to be OK, especially in those vulnerable first months. I just wish there was more awareness and support for adoptive parents like us.  There is some support available, but it's not always well-funded, and only this year we saw services cut back and financial support reduced.  My biggest piece of advice to adoptive parents is to find your tribe. I've joined various support groups for adoptive parents, and we chat online and share advice.  I've taken part in adoption events, offered advice and spoken about my experiences on social media.  I've made some wonderful friends, one of whom's child came from the same foster carers as Charlie. We are so similar, and it feels so good to have her in my corner whenever I need her.  We may not have pregnancy or birth stories to share, but we have our own unique experiences both lows and highs and just as much love for our children as other parents.  Most importantly, I no longer feel guilty for struggling. I went through something huge and now realise I'm only human.  I've become a stronger, more resilient mother and I love my child just as much as mums love their biological children. Post-adoption depression is nothing to be ashamed of.

As told to Julia Sidwell
5
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14946967/scottish-woman-heartbreak-birth-mother-long-lost-family.html

Scottish woman's heartbreak as she tracks down her birth mother after 50 years only to find out she doesn't want to meet

    Paula Stillie, from Scotland, appeared on Long Lost Family: What Happened Next
    READ MORE: Long Lost Family: Emotional moment woman, 66, who was diagnosed with cancer, reunites with daughter she gave up for adoption after becoming pregnant aged 16

By MAANYA SACHDEVA and JESSICA GREEN

Published: 14:21, 28 July 2025 | Updated: 15:14, 28 July 2025

A Scottish B&B owner who waited 50 years to meet her biological parents was left devastated after her birth mother refused to meet her during this week's episode of Long Lost Family: What Happened Next.  Paula Stillie, now 53, sought the help of the ITV program to answer questions about her background growing up in Buckie, Scotland, with the mother-of-one first reaching out to producers in 2021. Paula recalled early experiences of racism while living with her white adoptive parents and how she covered herself in talcum powder from 'head-to-toe' so that she would look more like them. 'I don't know where I come from. What are my roots? Who do I look like?' Paula, who lives with her husband Euan and their son Kyle, said.  'I don't feel as if I've got an anchor in life, I could come from anywhere in the world. I just don't know.  Being adopted you're different, but also of mixed race as well makes you even more different,' she explained. 'Why did I have a different skin colour to my mum and dad?'

She continued: 'I can remember covering myself in talcum powder from head-to-toe and Mum came in and I said, "I'm the same colour as you mum, I'm white". I think that broke her heart.'

In the latest episode of the ITV program, viewers catch up with Paula's emotional journey including the moment when she learned her birth mother did not want any contact with her.  Viewers admitted they were in tears by the end of the episode as Paula's heartbreak turns into healing when she is finally accepted by her late father's Native American relatives living in Montana, US.  In their search for Paula's biological family, producers were able to identify and track down her birth mother, who was living in England but she declined to meet the daughter she had given up for adoption. 'It was a shock that she didn't want to see me,' Paula confessed. 'I was disappointed.'

She admitted there will always be a 'feeling of rejection' when it comes to her relationship with her mother, adding: 'It's so, so sad that she'll never meet me.'

While she rejected Long Lost Family's offer to reunite with Paula, her birth mother offered a clue about her biological father an American man she called Larry Smith. 'It's a real longing within me to find my birth father. There's a whole other world out there that I don't know about that involves me,' Paula said.

Her father had travelled to England with the navy for a short period of time, but he was difficult to track down so the Long Lost Family team turned to DNA testing.  They discovered a distant match with a man named Joe, whose family tree, which was registered online, revealed Paula's paternal relatives were Native American.  The tree also included a man called Lawrence known to his family as John who was Paula's father. However, he tragically passed away in 1982.  Thankfully, researchers were able to discover Lawrence's younger brother Joe, who lived in Montana with the rest of the family.  Joe revealed to co-presenter Nicky Campbell that his sibling, who had no other children, never knew he had a daughter, but would have tried to find her had he known.  Paula's uncle Joe also explained that his grandfather George was part of the Comanche tribe in Oklahoma.  Paula's aunts and uncles Joe, Mary Louise, Nancy and Richard were keen to meet their new niece and welcome her, with Joe saying she was 'bringing John back to the family'.

The relatives met for the first time via video call but in the most recent episode were finally reunited after Paula travels to Montana.  'Being here, doesn't feel quite real. That I'm minutes away from meeting my family,' said Paula. 'It's just like this massive bubble of emotion ready to burst out.'

Following the emotional reunion with her uncle and aunts, she said: 'That was incredible. Opening the door and seeing them standing there, I can't describe the feeling. I've waited for this moment for so long.'

Viewers were left in tears at the scenes, with one writing: 'I wish just once I could get through Long Lost Family without crying.'

Another said: 'What a beautiful family and welcome for Paula and her family #LongLostFamily.'
6
Articles / Woman smuggled baby into UK using fake birth story
« Last post by Forgotten Mother on July 24, 2025, 07:12:15 PM »
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98jl8jnz92o

Woman smuggled baby into UK using fake birth story
14 July 2025
Sanchia Berg News correspondent, Tara Mewawalla, BBC News

Last summer, a woman was arrested at Gatwick Airport after she arrived from Nigeria with a very young baby girl.  The woman had been living in West Yorkshire with her husband and children, and before leaving the UK for Africa had told her GP she was pregnant.  That was not true.  When the woman returned about a month later with the baby, she was arrested on suspicion of trafficking.  The case, the second the BBC has followed through the Family Court in recent months, reveals what experts say is a worrying trend of babies possibly being brought to the UK unlawfully some from so-called "baby factories" in Nigeria.

'My babies are always hidden'

The woman, who we are calling Susan, is Nigerian, but had been living in England since June 2023, with her husband and children.  A careworker with leave to remain in Britain, Susan claimed she was pregnant. But scans and blood tests showed that wasn't true. Instead, they revealed Susan had a tumour, which doctors feared could be cancerous. But she refused treatment.  Susan insisted her previous pregnancies had been invisible on scans, telling her employer, "my babies are always hidden".

She also claimed she'd been pregnant for up to 30 months with her other children.  Susan had travelled to Nigeria in early June 2024, saying she wanted to have her baby there, and then contacted her local hospital in Britain, to say she had given birth.  Doctors were concerned and contacted children's services.  Arriving back in the UK with the baby girl who we're calling Eleanor Susan was stopped and arrested by Sussex Police.  She was bailed and the lead police force on this confirmed there is no active investigation at the moment.  After her arrest, Susan, her husband, and Eleanor were given DNA tests. Eleanor was taken to foster carers.  "When the results show that I am Eleanor's mother, I want her to be returned immediately," Susan said.

But the tests showed the baby had no genetic link with Susan or her husband. Susan demanded a second test which gave the same result, and then she changed her story.  She'd had IVF treatment before moving to Britain in 2023 with a donor egg and sperm, she said, and that's why the DNA tests were negative.  Susan provided a letter from a Nigerian hospital, signed by the medical director, saying she'd given birth there, as well as a document from another clinic about the IVF treatment to back up her claims.  She also provided photos and videos which she said showed her in the Nigerian hospital's labour suite. No face is visible in the images and one showed a naked woman with a placenta between her legs, with an umbilical cord still attached to it.

Someone had given birth it wasn't Susan

The Family Court in Leeds sent Henrietta Coker to investigate.  Ms Coker, who provides expert reports to family courts in cases like this, has nearly 30 years experience as a social worker. She trained in Britain, and worked in front-line child protection in London, before moving to Africa.  Ms Coker visited the medical centre where Susan claimed she'd had IVF. There was no record of Susan having had treatment there staff told her the letter was forged.  She then visited the place Susan said she'd given birth. It was a shabby, three bedroom flat, with "stained" walls and "dirty" carpets.  There Ms Coker was met by "three young teenage girls sitting in the reception room with nurses' uniforms on".

She asked to speak to the matron and was "ushered into the kitchen where a teenage girl was eating rice".

Ms Coker then tracked down the doctor who'd written a letter saying Susan had given birth there. He said, "Yes, someone had given birth".

Ms Coker showed him a photograph of Susan, but it wasn't her, the doctor said.  "Impersonating people is common in this part of the world," he told Ms Coker, suggesting that Susan might have "bought the baby".

The practice of "baby farming" is well known in West Africa, Ms Coker later told the court. At least 200 illegal "baby factories" have been shut down by the Nigerian authorities in the last five years, she said.  Some contained young girls who'd been kidnapped, raped, and forced to give birth repeatedly.  "Sometimes these girls are released," Ms Coker said, "other times they die during childbirth, or are murdered and placed in the grounds of the organisation."

It's not clear where baby Eleanor might have come from though the doctor told Ms Coker he believed she would have been given up voluntarily.  Ms Coker was unable to establish who Eleanor's real parents are.  She gave evidence to the Family Court in Leeds in March this year, along with Susan, her husband, her employer and a senior obstetrician.  At an earlier hearing the judge asked for Susan's phone to be examined. Investigators found messages which Susan had sent to someone saved in her address book as "Mum oft [sic] Lagos Baby".

About four weeks before the alleged date of birth Susan wrote a text message which read:  "Good afternoon ma, I have not seen the hospital items"

The same day, Mum Oft Lagos Baby responded:  "Delivery drug is 3.4 m

"Hospital bill 170k."

Assuming those sums to be Nigerian Naira, they would be in the region of £1,700 and £85 respectively, the Family Court judge, Recorder William Tyler KC said.  The local authority pointed out the messages were set to "automatic self-destruct mode" and said they represented evidence of a deal to purchase a baby.  Susan tried to explain the messages in court. The Recorder said her attempts were "difficult to follow and impossible to accept".

Recorder Tyler, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court, found Susan had "staged a scene" which she falsely claimed showed her giving birth to Eleanor in Nigeria.  He said Susan and her husband had put forward a "fundamental lie" to explain how Eleanor came to be in their care, and had tried to mislead authorities with false documents.  They'd both caused the little girl "significant emotional and psychological harm", he said.

In early July, the BBC attended the final hearing in Eleanor's case, held remotely.  In one little square of the Teams meeting we could see Susan and her husband, sitting upright, barely moving, focused closely on what the advocates said.  They wanted Eleanor returned to them. Their barristers said their own children were thriving they wanted to offer her the same love and care.  Susan's husband saw Eleanor as "a fundamental part of their family unit".

Vikki Horspool, representing the child's guardian, a social worker from the Independent Children and Family Child Advisory Service challenged that. She said that the couple "continued to be dishonest" about Eleanor's real start in life and how she came to be in their care. 
The judge ordered that baby Eleanor be placed for adoption, and also made a "declaration of non parentage". He said he was aware of the "pain" this would cause Susan and her husband.  The barrister for the local authority told the court that the baby is "very settled" with her foster carer, taking part in activities in her community and getting medical treatment.  When Eleanor is adopted she will have a new identity and British nationality but she may never know who her real parents are.  Eleanor's story echoes the case of "Lucy" who was brought into Manchester Airport in 2023, by a man claiming to be her father.  'Money exchanged for children'  Ms Coker believes it is likely that more children have been brought unlawfully to the UK from West Africa. She told the BBC she has worked on around a dozen similar cases since the pandemic. In her experience, baby trafficking is commonplace.  "Money is getting exchanged for children on a large scale" she said - not just in Africa but "across the global south".

Since 2021 the UK government has restricted adoptions from Nigeria, partly because of "evidence of organised child trafficking" within the country.  British authorities have been aware of the problem for many years, and there have been several cases in the Family Courts over the last 20 years.  Two hearings in 2011 and 2012 involved Nigerian couples who'd had "fertility treatment " that led to a "miracle baby".

These "treatments" continue, as recently exposed by investigative journalists at BBC Africa Eye.  In 2013, the UK High Commission in Lagos required DNA tests in certain circumstances before newborn babies could be taken from Nigeria to Britain.  Among 12 couples investigated was a former Oxford academic, prosecuted for immigration offences.  However this process has since stopped. In 2018 officials were advised that such DNA testing was unlawful.  They were told they could not make people undergo DNA testing when they were asking for a visa or passport in support of an application relating to immigration status and that had been the case since 2014.  Ms Coker said some clinics offer "packages" that include registering the baby's birth. It will cost anywhere between £2,000 and £8,000, excluding any airfare, she said.  She thinks more people in Britain should be aware of this activity.  It is hard to tackle, she said - perhaps DNA testing of newborn babies and purported parents would help.  But she wasn't sure the British government can do much to stop it, she said, "the issues start in countries where the children are born".

Patricia Durr, CEO of the anti-trafficking charity ECPAT said cases like this were particularly "heinous" because they denied a child right to their identity.  She said: "Every effort must be made to prevent these egregious crimes occurring."

A government spokesperson said: "Falsely claiming to be the parent of a child to facilitate entry to the UK is illegal. Those found doing so will face the full force of the law.  "Border Force is committed to protecting individuals who cross the border and where concerns are raised, officers will take action to safeguard individuals who could be at risk."

The BBC contacted the Nigerian High Commission for comment but they did not respond.

If you've been affected by issues raised in this story, there is information and support available on BBC Action Line.
7
Articles / 'Just say sorry', say forcibly adopted women
« Last post by Forgotten Mother on July 20, 2025, 05:54:01 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czdvg3y1jgeo

'Just say sorry', say forcibly adopted women

Fiona Irving & Jody Sabral BBC News, South East
Cash Murphy BBC News, South East

Published 14 July 2025

Two Kent women who were removed from their mothers when they were just weeks old and forcibly adopted say they need the government to formally apologise in order to help them recover from the trauma.  "Why can't they just say sorry? They haven't got the guts," said Helen Weston from Yalding who was taken from her 15-year-old mother when she was 12 days old.

Nikki Paine, from Ashford, who was adopted at six weeks old, and was diagnosed with PTSD, says she just wants an acknowledgement of what happened to her.  A demonstration is due to take place on Wednesday to urge the government to apologise to the hundreds of people forcibly adopted during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s as well as their mothers.  An inquiry by the human rights select committee, undertaken in 2021, looked at the experiences of children adopted across this period because their parents were either underage or not married.  Published in July 2022, its report recommended a formal apology after finding that babies were taken from mothers who did not want to let them go.  The Welsh and Scottish governments have officially apologised to those affected by forced adoptions, but the UK government so far has not.

'Wracked with guilt'

Ms Weston said: "If we get the validation then maybe my birth mother won't be so wracked with guilt and shame and keeping this dreadful secret."

She was adopted in 1967 after her teenage mother was forced to give her up.  She says it has had a profound impact on her life and was diagnosed with complex PTSD.  "I'm not angry with anybody, I think that's why I get so depressed," she said.

"If there was one person I could be angry at, if one person was responsible, then I could give them a gob full and get rid of it.  They genuinely thought they were doing the best for us."

Ms Paine, who has also been diagnosed with complex PTSD, will be among those demonstrating in Westminster on Monday.  She said: "We're all suffering from anxiety, we're all on antidepressants.  The apology would get the mental health support and that's really important." 

She said: "We want this to be recognised because they took me away from my mother.  I'm 63-years-old and it's still affecting my life."

'I wanted my real mum'

Wednesday's protest has been organised by adoptee advocate Zara Phillips, and is supported by the Movement for an Adoption Apology.  According to the group, between 1945 and 1976 an estimated 215,000 women had their children taken away from them.  A spokesperson for the group said: "We are all growing older and time is running out.  We have been ignored by successive governments and now urgently need a public apology for this very personal and painful lifelong trauma."

They said: "A public apology would help mothers and adoptees change the narrative around what was done to them.  It would acknowledge the injustice and the loss which will endure for the rest of their lives."

Some adoptees say they feel like they do not belong in their adoptive families especially when their adoptive parents have their own birth children.  Ms Weston said: "I was adopted into a family who had two children of their own, the dynamic with my adopted family was that I was always a problem child," said Mrs Weston.

Ms Paine echoed this sentiment, saying: "I told my mother that she never hugged me, but she said you never wanted me to, and I thought how can you say that, but of course I wanted my real mum."

The Department for Education has been approached for a comment.
8
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14891365/Melissa-Gilbert-biological-father-Little-House-Prairie.html?login&signinStatus=authenticated&signinMethod=password&dataCaptured=false&flowVariant=standard_signin_nosubscribe&param_code=k7pe13qbsjn75b4iqjln&param_state=eyJyZW1lbWJlck1lIjp0cnVlLCJyZWdTb3VyY2UiOiJtd2ViX2NvbW1lbnQiLCJyYW5kb21TdGF0ZSI6ImUyY2JkNzc5LTk0M2YtNDFmNi05NzJmLTE4NWVlYTVjYThjZCJ9&param_info=%7B%22signinStatus%22%3A%22authenticated%22%2C%22signinMethod%22%3A%22password%22%2C%22dataCaptured%22%3Afalse%2C%22flowVariant%22%3A%22standard_signin_nosubscribe%22%7D&param__host=www.dailymail.co.uk&param_geolocation=gb&base_fe_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2F&validation_fe_uri=%2Fregistration%2Fp%2Fapi%2Ffield%2Fvalidation%2F&check_user_fe_uri=registration%2Fp%2Fapi%2Fuser%2Fuser_check%2F&isMobile=false#newcomment

Adopted at birth Melissa Gilbert reveals astonishing moment she reconnected with biological father

    Have YOU got a story? Email tips@dailymail.com

By SONIA HORON FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Published: 03:02, 10 July 2025 | Updated: 08:01, 10 July 2025

Little House on the Prairie star Melissa Gilbert revealed how her biological father 'knew' she was his daughter from watching her onscreen.  The actress, 61, who was adopted after birth, discussed the journey of finding her biological parents on an episode of Patrick Labyorteaux's podcast on Tuesday.  As an adult, she found her birth father who was a stock car racer and musician and called him to share the news, only to find he already knew.  'I didn't tell him who I was, and then he asked me, "Well, who are you? What do you do?"'

Gilbert, who was raised by her adoptive parents, actors Barbara Cowan and the late Paul Gilbert, said.  'And I said, "Well, here's the thing." And I said, "Did you ever watch Little House on the Prairie?" And he said, '"You're Laura, aren't you? I knew it." He knew it,' she added.

'He could see,' she said of her character on the show, Laura Ingalls. 'And when I met my half siblings, we all look alike. So, you could definitely see it. So, it's pretty clear.'

Gilbert also discussed her birth mother Kathy, who passed away before she got to reconnect with her, sharing that she was a former exotic dancer.   Given her biological parents' background in entertainment, and her adoptive parents' acting backgrounds, Gilbert noted, 'It was pretty clear that it was in me.'

When she began 'searching' for her birth parents, Gilbert learned about their past.  'They were each married to other people and had three children each and ran off together and conceived me on a motorcycle trip in the desert,' she revealed.  Explains a lot. And then they left their spouses for each other and got married after [getting] pregnant with me and moved all the kids in, so I was number seven. So the decision was made to put me up for adoption.'

Gilbert also spoke about her two kids: Dakota, whom she shares with her first husband, director Bo Brinkman, and another son, Michael, born in 1995, whom she shares with her second husband, actor Bruce Boxleitner.  She noted how they also shared her physical features: 'When I saw [son Dakota] for the first time, I went, "Oh my god,"' Gilbert said of her first child, who was born in 1989.

'He had my eyebrows and he had my lips, and I'd never seen anyone that looked like me. And then I realized there's got to be more.'

Last year she paid tribute to her both her adoptive mom Barbara and biological mom Kathy in a touching Mother's Day post.  She shared a snap of herself with Barbara, as well as another photo of her birth mom holding a rifle.  'Happiest of Mothers Days to these two. The one with the rifle? I grew under her heart. The one beside me? I grew IN her heart.'

'This is my birth mother Kathy, who had the courage to love me enough to let me go. The stunning blonde is my mama @barbaragilbertcowan .She is just a magic person. And lucky me, I get to spend today with her.'

'Sending all mothers, stepmothers, God mothers, birth mothers, surrogate mothers, adoptive mothers and anyone who steps in to be a mother to a child who doesn’t have one. I honor you all today,' she wrote.

In 2022, Melissa opened up about losing her adoptive father Paul to suicide when she was a child, saying she didn't learn he had killed himself until she was 45.  She called him 'the most incredibly talented, vivacious, funny, loving, fair person I ever knew.'

Gilbert was adopted by Paul and his wife, actress Barbara, one day after her birth. The couple had been divorced for three years when he died in February 1976.  Like many people at the time, she and her adopted brother, Jonathan Gilbert, were told he died of a stroke in his sleep.  'I didn't know my father had died by suicide for a very, very long time,' she explained. 'I didn't find out till I was 45.'

Gilbert revealed her family's secret in her autobiography, Prairie Tale: A Memoir, which was published in 2009.  Melissa portrayed Laura, aka 'Half Pint', on the popular TV show Little House On The Prairie from 1974 until 1983, appearing in over 200 episodes.  Little House On The Prairie premiered with a pilot movie in March 1974 and celebrated its 50th anniversary last year.  She then continued to work throughout the 1980s and 1990s.  But eventually had to leave Los Angeles because of the 'pressures' she had faced over the years.  'All of the pressures, I faced all of them. When you live in Los Angeles, it's like living at the mall when you work at the mall,' she told People.

'Literally, everyone is in the business. When you walk into a restaurant, every head turns to see who walked in.  Everybody's always looking, curious, competing and that's a really difficult thing, especially for a female actor.'
9
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tv/article-14860477/baby-pink-abandoned-car-park-morning.html

I was abandoned by my mum in a car park 24 years ago now I've tracked down my dad and have a message for her I hope she never forgets

By ALEX DOYLE

Published: 12:53, 30 June 2025 | Updated: 14:18, 30 June 2025

A woman abandoned by her birth mother has returned to This Morning today 24 years after her first appearance on the show.  Sarah Meyer was left in a multistory carpark in 2001 and appeared on the ITV show's sofa as a newborn in a bid for police to trace her parents.  At the time, she had been dubbed the 'Baby In Pink' after being found in the Surrey location, wrapped in a pink towel.  More than two decades later, she returned to This Morning to give hosts Cat Deeley and Ben Shephard a major life update.  She told the pair how she was adopted after her appearance as footage showed her being doted on by then-hosts Judy Finnegan and Richard Madeley.  In the clip, Judy, now 77, held Sarah and told viewers: 'This little sprog was abandoned in a multi-story carpark. She was barely an hour old, weighing just 7lbs.'

After watching the tape back, Sarah said: 'It was crazy seeing that again and being back here. It's insane, full circle. I've been able to find my birth parents.  My foster parents have always kept me informed about my past, done it the right way. My backstory they've shown me the clips and newspaper. I've always had my identity and history, that's the way it should be. Any questions I've had, they answered.'

Sarah's search for her birth parents will be documented on Long Lost Family: Born Without A Trace this week.  She continued: 'I'm proud of my story. I wanted to find out what is out there but also wanted to show who is out there that I've had a good life.  I understand they'd also have the question of where am I now I wanted to show them that I'm okay and give them that reassurance. I'm at peace with it and they can put it to bed.  My birth mother thanked everyone for looking after me in a letter. The amount of gratitude of the people who stepped up to be my family is immense, they don't get enough gratitude. Nobody thanks them.  They are the start of the family for those people, Wendy was the start of my family.'

Wendy a police officer originally appeared on This Morning with Sarah in 2001.   Describing her birth father, Sarah told Cat and Ben: 'The fact that me and my dad are so alike is insane my dad didn't even know that I existed. The way he welcomed me into his family was insane. My nan worked in the hospital I was brought into.'

Addressing her birth mother's absence, she said: 'The door is open for my birth mother and always will be. I've had 24 years to process my story. My mum has had a much shorter amount of time to process it. Life is complex.'

Ben and Cat then played a sweet video message from Richard Madeley, filmed from his garden.  The 69-year-old said: 'What an end to an incredible story. We were so passionate about trying to find your family for you.  Huge congratulations from Judy and from me. Have a great rest of your life and lots of love.'

Sarah was joined on the sofa by Ariel Bruce, the lead researcher from Long Lost Family who used Sarah's DNA to finally get her answers on her birth parents.  Speaking about her journey, Ariel said: 'Sarah trusted us with her search and that's the beginning. I'm very grateful to do this sort of work.  We put Sarah's DNA across the four being genealogical sites. We use a combination of those connection and conventional genealogy to build a forensic narrative.  It's a mixture of science, good luck and detective work. It's only the beginning of the story though. Having contact is just the beginning of a lifelong journey.'
10
Articles / The family who saved orphans from the Vietnam War
« Last post by Forgotten Mother on June 28, 2025, 03:56:20 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3v5dn7qv9zo

The family who saved orphans from the Vietnam War

Simon Marks
BBC South

Published 30 May 2025

A family is marking the 50th year since a personal tragedy led to them adopting a baby from Vietnam.  RAF officer Mike Pritchard and his wife Jacquie from Chalgrove in Oxfordshire lost their baby son Steven to cot death while they were in Singapore in 1974.  In a tragic twist, Mrs Pritchard had been to hospital that same day for a sterilisation operation.  During the grief that followed they decided to do something positive. Knowing that the war in Vietnam had created many orphans, they made enquiries about adoption.  "A photograph was sent to us saying 'this is the baby you can have'," said Mrs Pritchard.

Mr Pritchard flew to Saigon to collect the boy, who they named Matthew.  "I held Matthew for the first time. His little eyes, I said 'you're the one for us'. Great, rubber stamped, done," explained Mr Pritchard.

But there was a snag. The paperwork would take six weeks, so Mr Pritchard had to fly back to Singapore without Matthew and wait.  Shortly afterwards, the couple heard news that a transport plane carrying orphan babies to America for safety had crashed with great loss of life.  They feared Matthew might have been on board. Mr Pritchard flew back to Saigon and learned that Matthew was safe. But he had been flown on a different plane to Sydney, Australia.  It was then that Mr Pritchard saw another opportunity.  "I said 'look I know I'll get out of here somehow. Do you want me to take some babies?" he said.

"I was asked, would I also take a 10-year-old blind boy?  I said yes of course! We headed for Hong Kong. All my babies in front of me in cardboard boxes.  A lot of people say I was very brave to do that. I just think I did what I needed to do."

The babies were eventually flown to Britain where they were collected by their new parents.  "Once I knew that these babies were safe with their adoptive families I thought 'this is where you step back'," said Mr Pritchard.

Back in Singapore, the couple waited for the plane that brought Matthew to them.  "We saw this woman walking along carrying this baby, she popped him in my arms and it was amazing," said Mrs Pritchard.

Brothers Philip and Matthew grew up together, attending boarding school and university in England.  Matthew remembers that as a child he attracted some attention.  "Looking back, I can understand people's curiosity. I'm Vietnamese and I've got British parents. But I just felt like a normal child that was loved and brought up", he said.

"The aspect of being rescued from a war zone never really crossed my mind. I feel very British. But I'm also very proud of my heritage and culture."

Matthews parents reflect with mixed emotions on the events of 1974.  "The tragedy of Steven dying. He didn't die in vain," said Mr Pritchard.

"Good always comes out of bad."
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10